Skip to main content

New Books

 

            It is fun to have a new book and open it to begin to read.  Even if I have some idea what might be in a book, I can never be sure until I begin to chase words across the page.  Regardless how fast anyone can read, no one can read a whole book at once.  It needs to be done page by page.  You can read it fast, but you cannot read it all simultaneously.

         It is also fun to reread some old books.  It is one I have wanted to reread for some time.  And it is one I have used for classes read for classes.  I know the author as a personal friend.  That is usually a nice thing, but also potentially a misleading thing.  If I know the person, I am a sitting duck to be duped.  Too easily, I assume I know “exactly what he will say.”  That usually makes me read the text too carelessly.  I “read into” the words and sentences what I “think he would be saying” instead of what the guy really said.

         So I sit, I open the book, and I read.  I let my friend begin to speak to me.  I like opening lines.  I always read the preface.  Important things are said there before the author actually gets to the topic at hand.  Prefaces are usually the time to give some thanks to all those who helped with the writing project.  And it gives tribute to all those who put up with you during the writing process!

         Parker Palmer is my friend and his book, which I picked up to begin rereading is called, The Active Life.  “Nice title,” I murmur.  It fits my life---an active life by my own definition.  I also am a sucker for sub-titles.  Parker’s is a good one: A Spirituality of Work, Creativity, and Caring.  “Right down my line,” I think.

         Now I was ready for the opening line.  It did not disappoint me.  Palmer says, “It is a mistake to imagine that writers are experts on the things they write about---at least, it is a mistake in my case!” (xi)  I liked this for a number of reasons.

         First, I liked it because Parker Palmer is not claiming he is an expert in a spirituality of work, creativity, and caring.  Neither am I!  He certainly has a great deal of experience in this arena.  But experience does not necessarily make one an expert.  In fact, the most practiced monks I know would cringe at the suggestion they are experts in spirituality.  Parker Palmer suggests contrarily that he is writing to think through what it means to develop a spirituality of work, creativity, and caring.  “Me, too,” I want to exclaim!

         That is a tall order.  Those are three big words: work, creativity, and caring.  Oh, I know enough about work.  But do I know about the spirituality of work?  Do I know how to work in the Spirit?  Can I become a labora spiritus---a laborer of the Spirit?  Tomorrow when I get up, I will think, “today I am off to be a spiritual laborer!”

         And creativity---that is a big one.  Too many of us think of Einstein or someone like him when we think of creativity.  But it can be more mundane and simpler than that.  One way to be creative is to make something.  In the case of spirituality, perhaps creativity can mean simply making something out of your life.  Today is my next best chance.  If not today, then I am a procrastinator, not a creator.

         Finally, there is the spirituality of caring.  I know enough Latin to know that “care-language” is a form of “love-language.”  To care is always ego-displacing.  If you care, for the moment someone or something matters more than you.  To care is to be for the other.  So if I am going to practice that spirituality today, I will look for those opportunities to be “other-focused.”  That’s easy, since there are so many “others” in my life every day.  If I care, they are everywhere!

         Ok, this book has sucker-punched me with its first line.  I will practice what I have just learned…and will continue.  You, too?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.             Brooks’ article focused on the 2016 contentious election.   He provocatively suggests, “Read Buber, Not the Polls!”   I think Brooks puts
1 comment
Read more

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was full of sports for me.   Commitment would have been presupposed t
6 comments
Read more

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.   And other groups practice this spiri
3 comments
Read more