Skip to main content

Back and Forth

 

            I’ve said it so many times, but every time it is true.  I like reading something that strikes my fancy and leaves me saying, “Yes, that’s exactly the way it is.”  I use words enough to think that most of the time I can answer almost any question.  And typically I could speak for five minutes on most subjects.  In fact, I try to teach students to listen to conversations or ask questions that always lead to new ideas.  “Make yourself an interesting participant in a conversation,” I tell them.

            So it was when recently I was reading my local newspaper.  No doubt I am one of those dinosaurs who still likes to pick up a real paper and read it with a good cup of coffee.  That is my morning ritual.  I am sure it won’t be the same when all of the newspaper in the world either fold up and go out of business or are only available on line.  It will not be the same to grab a cup of coffee and beginning reading the paper online.  It is difficult to fold my computer in half, make it rustle and enjoy the feeling of it.  Such was a recent morning.

            Oddly enough for this inspirational thought, I was reading the opinion page section of the newspaper.  Normally I do not expect to be inspired by that section!  Rather I usually am frustrated or depressed.  The world in which we live is not always a nice world.  In fact, it is often frustrating and depressing.  But I read on in one of Maureen Dowd’s pieces.  (I read them all…liberals and conservatives)

            Quickly I was engaged.  She narrated the story of a Catholic priest, Fr. Kevin O’Neil.  Fr. O’Neil was confronted by questions of “why?”  I resonate with this question.  Anyone who has had two-year olds in the house gets this question repeatedly.  And people who go through hard times often have that question, “Why?”  I like Fr. O’Neil’s answer.

            Fr. O’Neil simply said, “The truest answer is: I don’t know.”  I love this answer, although I know for too many people, it is not an acceptable answer.  People do not want to know that a priest or some other authority figure does not know an answer.  To hear that from a priest or a physician appalls us.  Usually we want the certainty of an answer.  Not to know is bad news.

            Of course, there are arenas where there may be answers and I am simply ignorant.  I know, for example, that there are answers to physics’ questions, but I am ignorant about those answers.  But there are other areas where there seem to be no answers.  These are areas Fr. O’Neil and I would call the unexplainable areas.  Even if I were to give you an answer, it would not be a real answer.  It would merely be an answer to get you off my back!

            I prefer the lead of Fr. O’Neil.  He says, “I have theological training to help me offer some way to account for the unexplainable.”  I do, too.  But as the good priest says, “the questions linger.”  Unless something is a real answer, it is not actually an answer.  If you give an answer for something unexplainable, it is not a real answer. 

            Again, let’s listen to these priestly words.  “I remember visiting a dear friend hours before her death and reminding her that death is not the end, that we believe in the Resurrection. I asked her, ‘Are you there yet?’  She replied, ‘I go back and forth.’  I almost laughed out loud at this response!  Asking someone if they believe in the Resurrection is a pretty big question.  Of course, each one of us could confidently affirm it to be true.  But saying it is true and believing it in the deepest core of our being are two different things.  Like the lady, I think I “go back and forth.”  Maybe that simply makes me a wimpy Quaker!

But I am an educated, wimpy Quaker.  That is why I resonated with Fr. O’Neil’s words when he said, “There was nothing I wanted more than to bring out a bag of proof and say, ‘See? You can be absolutely confident now.’”  Just like Fr. O’Neil, I learned much in seminary and graduate school.  I could cite all sorts of people who should make anyone confident in the Resurrection.  But maybe it is still hypothetical unless you really are dying.

Again, I found Fr. O’Neil’s words insightful.  He confesses, “there is no absolute bag of proof.  I just stayed with her.”  Is that not what so much ministry is?  Ministry is “staying with someone,” even if we don’t actually have all the answers---or any answer.  Perhaps that is exactly what the school of life and school of love teach.  They teach us to stay with someone.  This is what O’Neil calls “a life of faith.”

He says, “A life of faith is often lived ‘back and forth’ by believers and those who minister to them.”  I don’t know whether this line is an answer at all.  But I do believe it is true---deeply true.  It seems so true to me because my life of faith is back and forth.  I understand this to be true because the life of faith is more than intellectual knowledge.  Faith is lived deeper---where trust and hope are worked out.  And very often, this working out is back and forth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.           ...

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was f...

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate;...