This intrigue only became more pronounced when people would use
“soul” to talk about music, food and other things. What made some music “soul” and other forms
of music apparently not? Often it would be
used of the music and food, which African Americans played and enjoyed. I was interested in what qualities they
brought to food and music that made it soulful?
I was willing to accept the truth of that. I simply wanted to know more.
Recently, I bumped into some thoughts by the late psychologist,
James Hillman. Hillman died in
2011. He had studied the thought of the
Swiss, C.G. Jung. He was somewhat of a
rebel among his psychology peers. He was
not a person of faith, so this was not the driver of his interest in soul. I first became acquainted with him through
reading of Thomas Moore in some of his books in the 1990s. So running into more of Hillman was a good
reminder of what I once found had interested me. And it still does.
In attempting to offer his own take on soul, Hillman identifies
four qualifications, as he puts it. He
says that soul “refers to that unknown component which makes meaning possible,
turns events into experiences, is communicated in love, and has a religious
concern.” Each of these qualifications
of soul is instructive. I wanted to take
a moment and ponder each one. Doing so
helps me become even more clear how I want to understand and talk about soul.
In the first place, Hillman says that soul has to do with that in
us which makes meaning possible. I have
done a great deal of work over the years on the idea of meaning. It seems conclusively to me that only people
who have found a way to make some meaning in life can say that their lives were
good. I don’t know anyone who expresses
a hope that life is pointless. In fact,
many people are driven to despair because they don’t see any point to
life. In tragic cases this has led to
suicides. Literally, people have nothing
to live for. They finally reach that
decisive no-turn-around point when they take their own lives. This is a radical and tragic way to solve
what might be called the soul problem.
Of course, there are many different ways to make meaning. I don’t doubt that many people actually
“find” meaning. While this has been
attractive to me, I am not always sure where to look. If we find meaning, that suggests it already
exists out there; I just have to find it.
Others of us “make” meaning. This
suggests there perhaps is not just one way for us. There is no doubt in my mind that I have made
meaning by taking seriously some things people have told me. Add to that, I have read some people who help
me much more than others. If we are
Christians, surely Jesus becomes part of that meaning making. As a disciple, I want to claim that living my
life imitating what Jesus did is a way to make sense of life.
The second qualification Hillman described said that soul is that
which enables us to turn events into experiences. I know some don’t like this way of putting
it, but it does speak to me. I
understand events to be simply what happens to us. For example, two people might go to the same
lecture. That lecture is the event. Someone spoke and we heard her. But the event also gets interpreted by each
of us at the lecture. I find the speaker
to be fascinating. She speaks in a way
that I learn and grow from having attended the event. I pronounce it to be exciting and that I
experienced growth and felt some vitality.
The other person who went to the lecture can say that she was boring and
useless. These are different
experiences---different expressions of soul.
Next Hillman says that soul is communicated in love. That makes sense to me. True love is a communication of the deepest
part of who we are. We know words are
not adequate. If we can add a hug or
kiss, more love is communicated. To put
ourselves “really” in something feels like soul. If I don’t care, am listless or even show
some disdain, I am hardly communicating love.
I want to explore this one even more.
Finally, Hillman says that soul has a religious concern. I admit I am not fully confident I know what
he means here, since I know he was not what we usually call a religious or
spiritual guy. I don’t want to get into
what religion is. Rather, I want to
assume that what he means is soul has to do with the deepest part of who we
are. Personally, religion has to do with
how I understand myself to be part of God’s gracious creation. And within that creation, I am blessed with a
particular and special role. Since God
is love in my definition, then we have a unique relationship with that
lovingly, creative God.
Soul is my willing participation in my life with God. It is meaningful, deeply experiential, loving
and life-fulfilling. That’s soul, as I
ponder it.
Comments
Post a Comment