Skip to main content

Prayers

I know it is good for me periodically to reflect on the basics of my spirituality.  I like to chase novel thoughts, interesting tangents, and oblique possibilities in contemporary spirituality.  But then, like a guy who has had too many sweets, all I want is the basics.  And I am always helped by an incident or a story that orients me in basic directions.

One such opportunity came yesterday when I encountered two old friends in some writing they did.  And it landed me straight back in prayer---perhaps the most basic of the spiritual disciplines.  Every time I come back to prayer, I realize what a lousy job I do sometimes in my prayer life.  As a Quaker sage once said, when you have been flagging in your disciplines, begin again---begin again right where you are.

The story I read begins with Will Willimon, long-time chaplain at Duke University and now Methodist bishop.  Willimon comments, “I was at a community gathering in which a minister prayed, ‘Great One, source of all being, immerse us in the human condition. Amen.”  I must admit, I giggled when I read only this far.  But then the next line made me laugh out loud.

The author said, “I was seated next to Walter Brueggemann, who muttered at the end of the prayer, ‘Lord, this is Walt. I don’t want any more immersion in the human condition than I’ve already got.’”  I have known Brueggemann for three decades.  He is the pre-eminent Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) scholar in this country.  But he is a man of God and has a great sense of humor.

His response is wonderful.  I can just hear him saying, “Lord, this is Walt.”  It makes me connect to my own relationship with God.  I want again to get back to that place where I, too, can say, “Lord, this is Alan.”  And like Brueggemann, I don’t need any more immersion in the human condition.  I have it pretty good, but nobody escapes life’s suffering, disappointments, and failures.

Perhaps you laughed with me at Brueggemann’s response.  But let’s take it a little deeper.  What strikes me initially about Brueggemann’s prayer is its authenticity when compared to the praying minister at the community event.  Brueggemann may be a high-class scholar and could pray in many languages, but his prayer was simple and authentic. 

He did not say, “Lord, this is Dr. Brueggemann.”  No, he was Walt.  And so are we all in the Divine Presence.  Walt was connecting to God in the most basic way---heart to heart.  My heart---like Walt’s and like yours---is my center, my core self.  No doubt that is why we can say we love “heart and soul.” 

And I think we pray in exactly the same way; at least, we pray this way when it is heart to heart with God.  When I go back to the basics, I am leaving the world of flowery phrases in prayer.  I am leaving the superficial shows of my worldly self. 

A return to the basics is always a re-centering experience for me.  It is like a homecoming.  It is a restoration of a relationship that, honestly, I can’t believe or understand why I wander away.  “Lead me not into temptation,” I am sure I have prayed.

But I was either led or wandered away anyway!  So, it is back to the basics.  “Lord, this is Alan."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.           ...

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was f...

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate;...