Skip to main content

Three Poisons

I have been re-reading some of Thomas Merton’s journals in order to write a paper I promised I would write.  As a Trappist monk, Merton had a fairly rigorous daily schedule.  The monastery in Kentucky where he resided had the monks showing up for their first worship of the day at 3:15am.  This was the first of seven times they would show up.  Some of the times were rather brief---fifteen minutes or so.  But they still showed up.  Besides that, every monk had a particular job or responsibility.
   
Among other things, Merton was assigned to teaches the novices.  A novice is a person who has just entered the monastery.  A significant aspect of the novice life is spiritual formation.  Basically, you have to live the monastic life long enough to get an idea whether you wanted to make a lifetime commitment.  And you would need to learn some history and other basics of monastic life.  In monastic language, you needed to be there to discern whether God is calling you to that way of life.  In effect, Merton would be a mentor to these mostly young men.
   
He would lecture to them.  And he would meet weekly with each one individually.  These one-on-one meetings would be a form of spiritual direction or guidance.  Merton’s job was to help the young novice “hear” what God might be saying.  In Quaker language, Merton’s job was to help the younger men get “clear” whether the monastery was the place they were to live out their spiritual commitment and discipleship.  I have always suspected that Merton was doing in the monastery what I so often am doing in a college classroom. 
   
Merton also was a copious writer.  The abbot basically assigned writing to be the work of Thomas Merton.  He was a voracious reader.  In truth it is amazing to see how much he managed to produce in what feels like a limited amount of time.  And sadly, he suddenly and tragically died at the young age of 53.  He was speaking at an inter-monastic conference in Thailand when he died. 
   
One of the things I have been reading is his journal from his last year.  His last journal entry is November 8, 1968 while he was at the conference in Bangkok.  Even though I have read this journal before, I was surprised to get new things as I read it this time.  One of the surprises was a very short entry which he wrote on November 3, 1968.  Interestingly, this is the day before he met the Dalai Lama in northern India.  During the previous two months of travel in Asia, Merton had been reading spiritual literature from Hinduism, Buddhism and Zen.  In fact, the November entry is a rather long one in which he is working with this literature.
   
And then he writes a very cryptic, but amazing, piece.  Merton writes, “The three poisons: craving, hatred, ignorance.”  I was intrigued by this, but don’t recall ever seeing it when I read this journal in an earlier sitting.  There is much to like and be instructed by this, so let me unpack it a bit.
   
I understand these three characteristics are poisonous.  It makes sense to me that they do poison our system.  They do not lead to good outcomes.  They can be both psychological and spiritual.  They are destructive, not constructive.  Let’s look at each one in order.
   
First comes craving.  Craving is crucial in the Buddhist spirituality.  Craving is the problem that is addressed in the Four Noble Truths, the core Buddhist teaching.  Perhaps in our Christian, more Western tradition, we get at the meaning of craving when we think about attachments.  For example, I might be attached to my own ego desires.  Anyone who is selfish is attached to a particular image of self.  Basic to any spirituality is to recognize and detach ourselves from that which we crave.  It is easy to understand that our cravings can enslave us.  If we are attached (or even addicted), we have no freedom.  We are stuck. 
   
The second poison is hatred.  This requires much less commentary.  Hatred also is a form of prison.  Hate is a poisoned relationship.  Although we never think about it, hate destroys us as well as our intended destruction of the other.  It is a lose-lose situation.  No one in a hate situation is whole or healthy.  I am sure this is why Jesus spends so much time on love and forgiveness.  Those are the antidotes to hate and the way to spiritual wholeness.
   
The third poison Merton identifies does not seem quite as strong.  Ignorance might be a more benign poison---it won’t kill our spirits quickly!  But if ignorance reigns, we will never grow or make any progress.  It also is a form of stuck-ness.  Ignorance also imprisons us.  Of three poisons, ignorance may be the easiest to address.
   
The way to treat these poisons is obvious.  Knowledge takes care of ignorance.  Love erases the spirit of hate.  And detachment fixes the craving problem.  This sounds simple---and it is.  But it is not always easy.  The key is to recognize this and to spend time in wholesome, healthy spiritual exercises.  It is the way to truth and this leads to life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.             Brooks’ article focused on the 2016 contentious election.   He provocatively suggests, “Read Buber, Not the Polls!”   I think Brooks puts

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was full of sports for me.   Commitment would have been presupposed t

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.   And other groups practice this spiri