Skip to main content

Works of Mercy

Probably one of the most quotable figures on the face of the earth is the Pope, Francis.  Partly this is because there are so many Roman Catholics in the world.  And another part is the fact that many non-Catholics---like me---want to know what the Pope is thinking and how he articulates that.  I suppose a third reason why the Pope speaks and folks listen is because the Pope inevitably plays a political role in the world simply because he is Pope.  There is no other comparable religious figure on earth.
  
I routinely read a Catholic periodical online just to stay abreast of what the Pope is up to and what the Catholic Church is thinking about.  Part of the online journal is usually a quotation or two from Pope Francis.  Recently I saw one of these that focused on mercy and would like to share it and then comment on it.
  
It is a bit lengthy, but it is worth sharing as a whole.  “We usually think of the works of mercy individually and in relation to a specific initiative: hospitals for the sick, soup kitchens for the hungry, shelters for the homeless, schools for those to be educated, the confessional and spiritual direction for those needing counsel and forgiveness.  But if we look at the works of mercy as a whole, we see that the object of mercy is human life itself and everything it embraces. Life itself, as “flesh”, hungers and thirsts; it needs to be clothed, given shelter and visited, to say nothing of receiving a proper burial, something none of us, however rich, can do for ourselves. Even the wealthiest person, in death, becomes a pauper; there are no removal vans in a funeral cortege.  Life itself, as “spirit”, needs to be educated, corrected, encouraged and consoled.  We need others to counsel us, to forgive us, to put up with us and to pray for us.”  These words from Pope Francis came in an address called the Jubilee for Priests and was delivered in June, 2016.
  
In the first place I find it interesting that the Pope talks about mercy from the perspective of works.  Mercy is something we do or give, usually to another person or group.  Mercy is like grace; typically, it is understood as gift.  If we are able to make our own way---make our own breaks---then we don’t need mercy.  Mercy tends to be an issue when dealing with the young, the infirm or those who are disadvantaged somehow.  Mercy is for those who can’t do it themselves.  We get a sense of its meaning when we hear the plea, “Don’t give me what I deserve; give me mercy.”  Notice the list of receivers of mercy the Pope points out: hospitals, soup kitchens, shelters, schools, etc.
  
It is at this point the Pope pushes a little deeper in his analysis of mercy.  He says the object of mercy is human life itself.  Mercy may seem to be addressing a more specific issue, i.e. homelessness, hunger, illness---but the real object is more general, namely, human life itself.  The Pope pushes even deeper.  Life comes to each of us in two forms.  Life is flesh and life is spirit.  Let’s look at both of these.
  
Life as flesh has to do with the radical humanness of each of us.  Life as flesh is life as vulnerability.  We get hungry; we get sick; we need other basics things, like clothing, shelter and so forth.  Life as flesh ultimately knows itself to be mortal.  Ultimately, we will not be able to do for ourselves---to sustain ourselves by ourselves.  Not even the wealthy can do this, admonishes the Pope.  Ultimately, we are all dependent.  Of course, we may be independent for a long time.  But at some point, there is not enough wealth, strength or anything else that can spare us or save us.  We are at the mercy of the process that will lead to our undoing.  Or alternatively, we are at the mercy of God and God’s helpers to grace us with life, which we may not even deserve.
  
Life is a gift and ultimately, a pure gift.  The Pope gets at this when he looks at life in its other dimension, namely, life as spirit.  Life as spirit is core to who we really are.  But to learn this requires mercy from others.  We need to be educated and corrected when we go wrong.  We need the mercy of forgiveness and the mercy of encouragement.  I like how the Pope puts it when he says we need the mercy of others to put up with us!  I know this kind of mercy as a parent to my kids.  Since I am a child of God, I guess it is the same deal!
  
There is no doubt all of us will be the recipient of mercy.  This will certainly be true when we receive the mercy of God.  But most of us will probably receive the mercy from others—from our family and friends and, perhaps even, from strangers.  It causes me to say, “God bless the merciful.”  I think the Pope suggests that mercy is a work.  It is not necessarily easy.  In some cases, it is difficult because the person we show mercy is not a friend or even someone we like.  It is easy with family and friends.  But as children of God, we can’t play favorites!  We are called to be God-like.  Jesus said, “Blessed are the merciful.”
  
I may not be full of mercy yet, but with what little I have, I can start practicing.  Following the Pope, I want to get on the mercy bandwagon.  I want to be a merciful disciple.  I am confident we learn mercy by doing works of mercy.  Real mercy is not just an idea; it is a work of the spirit.  To do works of mercy asks us to put our ego aside and be other-centered for a while.  It may well be “more blessed to give than to receive.”  Maybe that is the logic of mercy.
  
Finally, after thinking about mercy, the only thing to do is go to work---to work mercy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.             Brooks’ article focused on the 2016 contentious election.   He provocatively suggests, “Read Buber, Not the Polls!”   I think Brooks puts

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was full of sports for me.   Commitment would have been presupposed t

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.   And other groups practice this spiri