I have been working my way through Ilia Delio’s book, The Unbearable Wholeness of Being. It is not an easy book and challenges the belief with which I grew up. But it is very rewarding and pulls me into thinking about God, myself and the world in fresh ways. Delio is a Franciscan Sister who is Senior Fellow in Science and Religion with the Woodstock Theological Center at Georgetown University. She is a trained scientist, a theologian and a Catholic Sister. What a combination!
Many people would simply not read her. Too many folks I know still are simply religious, but give no truck to science. In fact, they are not even interested in science. Of course, I am sure they hope their personal physician paid attention to the science they were learning in order to make it through medical school! People like this, I am afraid, do know understand the world in which they live.
It is ok not to understand the world in which we live. I am convinced I don’t understand that much. But I think it is important. Let me explain. Stated simply, I think my world has to correlate with the God in whom I believe. It seems clear to me that I cannot read the Genesis creation account in a literal sense. There is nothing about the way scientists talk about the world that suggests it happened in seven days. Most reputable scientists adhere to some form of evolution to explain a world---our world---that is some 13 billion years old.
And so Delio is helping me tie together the world as scientists understand it and a view of God that makes sense with this picture of the world. I appreciate this process. Even as a kid, it did not make much sense to sense a God “up there.” I am sure it made sense when I was three or four, but when you send men to the moon, “up there” takes on a different sense. And now we know there are many universe---galaxies beyond galaxies and soon my mind is blown!
About half way through Delio’s book, I found a nugget that helps me put together a picture of God and the world. She says, “Christianity is a religion of evolution in that it anticipates a new creation that is not individual but communal, the unity of all persons and creation in God.” (123) I very much appreciate the way she describes my own tradition: Christianity is a religion of evolution. This can be a tenet of belief for me, even if I do not know everything there is to know about that.
For sure, I am a kindergartner in my understanding of evolution and its scientific process, etc. But I also do not know much about how the motor in my car works, but I have no trouble having faith it does and taking off to some place down the road. I trust the world is evolving---whether I understand it or not! And I think God has a hand in that process---whether I understand it or not!
Let’s follow Delio’s argument in that one sentence I quoted. Christianity as a religion of evolution anticipates a new creation. That sounds much like the end of the New Testament book of Revelation. There heaven is portrayed as a new creation. I sense that Delio is saying that new creation is evolving. God is part of the process and so are we. In this way we truly are co-creators. That is exciting to me. Talk about having something to do!
Delio's next point might be a little threatening. She says the new creation coming to be is not individual but communal. There probably are ways I can misunderstand this, but I am confident she means that the new creation is not about me---at least not solely about “just me” in a self-centered way. Rather, the new creation is about us. But the good news is I am not discounted; instead, I am counted in. I am included in the community. I think her vision of this evolutionary, creative, communal process is big.
The aim of all this new creating is the unity of all persons. Furthermore, it is the unity of all creation in God. I am intrigued by two little words that make a big difference. In the first place she talks about the unity of all persons. This might make some people mad; others will be disappointed. Some of our religions don’t want everyone to be included. Some of us truly want some others to “get what’s coming.”
From God’s perspective, we are all going to “get what’s coming.” This is truly where our view of God is at stake. If I were God, some people would really be in trouble. But then, I find it hard to love all people. However, I am willing to understand God is bigger and better than I am! I can imagine somehow in faith God can pull it off.
The second little word I liked was Delio’s note that the unity of all persons is accompanied by the unity of creation in God. This means religion is not just a human thing. It is human and cosmic---the world is included in the evolution of religion. Obviously, this has tremendous implications. It argues that we care for our world, just as we are to care for each other. I know I have much to learn and to put in action on this point.
I appreciate what Ilia Delio is offering me. She offers me a way to understand religion as evolution and invites me into the process of a new creation. It’s exciting.
Comments
Post a Comment