Skip to main content

Nothing Profane

I was reading a book looking for something else when I came across this short quotation from Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.  I like much of what de Chardin wrote, although I have not read everything.  And probably most folks don’t know who he is, so let me provide some rudimentary information.
   
de Chardin was a French, Jesuit priest who was born in the nineteenth century and died in 1955.  So, he was dead before I had any knowledge of this amazing man.  He was trained as a scientist.  He also joined the Jesuit order, long known for its intellectual focus and emphasis on teaching.  He developed a significant interest in evolution and wanted to find creative ways to show the compatibility of religion and science. 
   
In 1923, he first traveled to China to participate in studies on geology and paleontology.  He was part of some famous finds of pre-human species that tie humanity further back in the evolutionary history of our world.  Throughout this process, de Chardin was in trouble with the higher-ups in the Jesuit world.  Most of what he wrote, they refused to publish.  Hence, his fame blossomed well after his death when his books finally found their way into print. Oddly, it is only in this century de Chardin is getting his due.
   
His perspective is what I would call a Christian evolutionary viewpoint.  He felt like the world was evolving from its earliest materialistic birth into a complex spiritual culmination he called the Omega Point.  He felt that evolution was a response to a spiritual “pull” that could best be understand from the perspective of Christ.  His theology portrayed Christ as the organizing principle of the entire cosmos or universe.  It was an expansive, inclusivistic view of the faith and the universe.  I find it breathtaking.
   
With this quick background, perhaps you can also appreciate the one-liner I read.  It is simple, but profound.  de Chardin says, “Nothing here below is profane for those who know how to see.”  Even if you never heard of this French Jesuit, this should be an appealing quotation.  Even if I am not sure I believe it is true, I hope it is!  I can’t prove it is true, but I do believe it is and I sure hope it is.  Let’s unpack the short quotation and elaborate on its meaning.
   
The first half of de Chardin’s words---nothing here below is profane---is really a statement of faith.  Clearly, if we look at the news any night of the week, there sure seems to be bad, lousy stuff happening all the time.  We live in an era of terrorism.  There are people daily dying of drug overdoses.  And there is a plethora of people I know who are depressed, some despairing and even more who simply find life to be a bummer.  There is poverty, injustice and all sorts of mayhem in our world today. 
   
And if you listen very long---even on traditional media---there is profanity all over the place.  When I was a kid, I would have told you profanity was someone swearing.  With that definition, nearly everyone I know is profane---at least, by my earlier standard definition.  However, when I became a little more educated, picked up some foreign languages and learned some theology, I knew that profanity was a Latin word and was to be put against its opposite, namely, sacred.  Profane is the opposite of being sacred.
   
Literally, the language of sacred is holy.  Holiness is associated with God and all that is God’s.  In ancient days, the sacred place was the temple.  And to be outside the temple was to be in the profane place.  All the development of sacred/profane distinctions go back to this basic difference.  To be sacred is somehow to be with God or within the God-sphere.  And to be profane is to be outside the sphere of God.  With this in mind, we now return to that first half of de Chardin’s quotation.
   
Here below there is nothing profane if the second half of his quotation is true.  That second line says, “for those who know how to see.”  de Chardin wants us to know that if we know how to see, there is nothing profane.  What he affirms is those who know everything in this universe is of God will know there is nothing beyond the pale of the Divinity.  This is a very bold statement.  It is a radical faith statement.
   
I want to have those kind of “eyes to see.”  With these eyes, I will realize here below there is nothing profane.  I don’t think de Chardin was naïve.  He did not deny the level of awfulness that existed in his world nor ours.  But the awfulness of our world is not the ultimate.  It is not the last word or the final reality.
   
His perspective is really a gospel perspective.  It is a perspective of hope based in faith.  He was a theologian of love.  He was not optimistic because he was smart.  He was optimistic because he knew the heart of the gospel and trusted the Revealer of that good news.  He wanted us to know we are primarily spiritual beings.  He had funny ways of articulating it.  He would say we are spiritual beings having a human experience.  Some of our human experiences are lousy and even worse.
   
But in the end, there is nothing profane.

Popular posts from this blog

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.There are liberals and conservatives.There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions. There are defining doctrines and religious practices.Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan, which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.Something like meditation would be a good example.Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.And other groups practice this spiritual discipline. A favorite way I like to …

A Pain is not a Pain

A rose may be a rose, but a pain is not a pain.  Maybe somebody has said that before, but I have never heard it.  So I am assuming (for the moment) I made it up.  Of course, most of us have heard that line, “a rose is a rose.”  I don’t know who said it first or if I should give it a footnote, but I do know that I did not create that line.  Furthermore, we all could explain what the phrase, a rose is a rose, means.

However, if I say, “a pain is not a pain,” the reader may not be too sure what I mean by that.  And if the reader is unsure, he or she does not know whether to agree with me or say balderdash!  So let me explain it by some development.

For sure, every adult knows what pain means.  It is difficult to imagine living into adulthood and not experiencing some kind of pain.  There is physical pain; we all know this.  There is emotional pain----a pain many people know all too well…and others may barely know.  There may be something like spiritual pain, but this one is tricky.  Not …

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”
The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.A committed person was someone to be admired.He was loyal and steady.Now a commitment is something you avoid.You don’t want to tie yourself down.”I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.
For example, growing up was full of sports for me.Commitment would have been presupposed to be part of a team. If you were going to pl…