Skip to main content

Spiritual Fundamentals

Often it is tempting to go with the novel and the faddish in spirituality.  Spirituality came onto the national scene---particularly for non-Catholics---in the 1980s.  Before that time, it would have been rare to hear churches or church leaders talking about “spirituality.”  Instead, one typically heard words about religion, theology, etc.  In college students took religion classes and theology classes.  Maybe Roman Catholic seminaries talked about spirituality, but I never heard about it.

However, in the 70s and 80s things began to change.  What led this change is less important than the impact of the change.  No doubt, part of the change came about because of Vatican II which opened up Catholicism by lessening Protestant fears of Rome.  There were other windows of change that were thrown open.  The impact was enormous.

One feature of this that resonated with my own religious tradition, Quakerism, was a new focus on experience.  Spirituality tends to start with human religious experience.  This is different than beginning with doctrine or theology.  Certainly, one can move from experience to doctrine.  But it is harder to move in the other direction.  For example, I might have an idea of who God is.  I may “believe” in God.  But that doesn’t mean I have ever experienced God.  I may have no first-hand knowledge of God.  To put it bluntly, I may “know about” God without “knowing” God.

Spirituality begins with “knowing” God.  Spirituality developed as a way to talk about how we help others “meet” or “encounter” God.  It might deal with something like prayer before dealing with theology.  In fact, things like spiritual disciplines become very important in the concern with spirituality.

I like the way Roger Walsh puts this in his book, Essential Spirituality.  This book deals with what I like to call spiritual fundamentals.  Walsh says, “The ultimate aim of spiritual practices is awakening, that is, to know our true Self and our relationship to the sacred.”  Spiritual practices are about the fundamentals of the religious life.  They should be the beginning point rather than ideas about God or Jesus or whatever.  I also like that Walsh tells us that the ultimate aim of these practices is awakening.

Why is awakening important?  I would say not only is it important; it is crucial.  Let’s look at the phenomenon of awakening.  What does it presuppose?  Awakening presupposes that we have been asleep, unconscious or otherwise out of it.  Awakening is a “coming to.”  Awakening is the process of coming out of the night of sleep into the dawn of a new spiritual day.  Awakening enables me to become aware and, even, begin to pay attention to the potential spiritual journey that I am choosing.

As Walsh indicates, awakening enables us to come to know our true Self.  This is a mighty concept about which books are written.  Obviously the true Self stands in contrast to the false self.  The illusion of the false self is that it exists when, in fact, it does not.  The false self is a construct of our ego and has us pretending to be someone other than who we really are. 

The spiritual journey is a journey away from the false self toward the true Self.  Why is one spelled with a capital “S” and the other with a small “s?”  It is one way to indicate only the true self is also an awakening into the realization that our true self is also a participant in the Divine Self.  This participation transforms the self into the true Self.  We discover that we are no longer our own.  We realize and embrace the fact that finally we really are God’s.  We are God’s children---God’s beloved children. 

The spiritual journey is the journey to knowing our relationship with the sacred.  This journey does nothing except to make us saints.  A saint is one who is in conversation with the sacred and fully engaged in the sanctification process.  That last phrase, sanctification process, sounds like a page out of some holy-roller tradition.  For a long time, I did not like the language of sanctification.  In some sense, I feared it.  But I was still asleep to its meaning and potential for my own life.

Now I see and accept that the spiritual journey is by definition a sanctifying journal.  I figure we are either on the path of becoming saints or sinners.  There is no middle ground.  Only those of us stuck in our false self assume there is a middle ground---the choice not to become a saint, but certainly convinced that one is not a sinner.

I want to awaken.  I want to take on the spiritual fundamentals so that I can begin to walk the way of sanctification and become a saint.  I don’t think this will necessarily make me perfect.  It will enable me to become a child of God---one of the beloved.  I can imagine no greater treasure than this.  But you can’t bank on it.

Popular posts from this blog

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.There are liberals and conservatives.There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions. There are defining doctrines and religious practices.Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan, which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.Something like meditation would be a good example.Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.And other groups practice this spiritual discipline. A favorite way I like to …

A Pain is not a Pain

A rose may be a rose, but a pain is not a pain.  Maybe somebody has said that before, but I have never heard it.  So I am assuming (for the moment) I made it up.  Of course, most of us have heard that line, “a rose is a rose.”  I don’t know who said it first or if I should give it a footnote, but I do know that I did not create that line.  Furthermore, we all could explain what the phrase, a rose is a rose, means.

However, if I say, “a pain is not a pain,” the reader may not be too sure what I mean by that.  And if the reader is unsure, he or she does not know whether to agree with me or say balderdash!  So let me explain it by some development.

For sure, every adult knows what pain means.  It is difficult to imagine living into adulthood and not experiencing some kind of pain.  There is physical pain; we all know this.  There is emotional pain----a pain many people know all too well…and others may barely know.  There may be something like spiritual pain, but this one is tricky.  Not …

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”
The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.A committed person was someone to be admired.He was loyal and steady.Now a commitment is something you avoid.You don’t want to tie yourself down.”I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.
For example, growing up was full of sports for me.Commitment would have been presupposed to be part of a team. If you were going to pl…