I am enjoying my slow read through Krista Tippett’s recent
book, Becoming Wise. She writes with insight and eloquence and
that is refreshing in an age where there is so much superficiality and bad
thinking. The other thing I very much
like about her work is how significantly it is grounded in experience. Even though it is a book about spirituality
with a dose of religion thrown in, it is not dogmatic or doctrinaire. To the contrary. Instead, it is about living---as she says in
the book’s subtitle, “the art of living.”
By now I have lived many years, but I am still trying to be
an artist---an artist of my own life.
Who would not want his or her life to be a thing of beauty? It should not be a superficial beauty. Real beauty is deep and it is profound. I am not sure I have approximated either of
those yet.
Even though I have followed Tippett’s weekly interviews for
the radio, I was not sure what I would get in the book. Certainly some things are fairly
predictable. But other things
surprise. An early surprise in her book
was the focus on virtue. I have been
thinking about and writing on virtue for more than a decade, so obviously I was
intrigued what she would bring to me.
In her introductory chapter she offered the first clue to
the role virtue would play in her thinking and writing. She says, “The connective tissue of these
pages is the language of virtue---an old-fashioned word, perhaps, but one that
I find is magnetic to new generations, who instinctively grasp the need for
practical disciplines to translate aspiration into action.” That is a great sentence and one that
resonates so well with my own experience.
More than a decade ago when my colleague and I began using
the language of virtue, people surely thought we were old-fashioned. The prevailing language of academics and the
American culture since the 1980s had been the language of values. Schools would devote time to “values
clarification.” Schools and businesses
encouraged their cultures to hold close to values. There is nothing wrong with this, but I was
never altogether happy with the language of values because that language is
rooted in economics.
For good reason we talk about the value of a house or the
value of an education. To use value language
in the realm of morals and ethics seems out of place. The old-fashioned language of virtues my
colleague and I chose to describe classical moral issues like justice, love,
etc. And it seems this is where Tippett
is going.
I believe she is correct that new generations are open to
virtue language. My experience says they
don’t necessarily know or use this way of seeing and talking about life. But they “get it” very quickly when they see
how it works to describe their reality.
Further, Tippett is clever to hook up the language of virtue with the
need for practical disciplines. This is
a big piece missing in so many lives today.
It is easy to see conversations about meaning in life and
ethical action as hypothetical or theoretical.
For example, students don’t always see the connection between who I am
and what I do---with identity and action.
I think action betrays true identity, regardless of who I say I am. That is why ethics is called character---or
lack of it!
And then, I like how Tippett links practical discipline with
the process of translating aspiration into action. Countless times I have followed Aristotle who
says finally virtue is virtue when it becomes an action. Until you love, love is only an idea. This leads me to the other sentence I want to
share from Tippett’s book.
She confesses, “I’ve come to think of virtues and rituals as
spiritual technologies for being our best selves in flesh and blood, time and
space.” Again, this is a powerful
sentence. I admit I never thought about
the virtues as technologies. I never
thought about spiritual technologies. I
think about technology to be rooted in skill or ability. For example, to use the computer is to avail
yourself of technology to do amazing things that are not otherwise possible. Maybe the virtues do the same thing for
creating and developing our best selves.
I’m convinced she is correct. If someone were to ask me “how do I develop
my best self?” that would be a tough question to answer. Now with her take on it, I have a good
answer. Be virtuous. Let the virtues be your technology to
transform your aspiration (to be your best self) into action (a person with
high character). It’s simple, but maybe
not easy.
I will still probably think about spirituality as more of an
art than science. But I will begin
thinking about spiritual disciplines as technologies---skills you can learn to
practice in a disciplined way to become your best self.
Comments
Post a Comment