Skip to main content

Mercy of Obligation

In a busy day which involved interaction with a few, separate friends of mine, it hit me that I am obligated in some interesting ways.  I never thought about obligation in the fashion I would like to lay out in this reflective piece.  Normally, I don’t think much about obligations.  I would confess it is not even a word that I like that much.  Maybe that stems from my Quaker suspicion of authority.  Too often, authorities put us under obligation.  Erroneously perhaps, I have tended to equate obligation with orders from somebody!

I welcome a chance to think afresh about obligation.  And when I attach the word, mercy, with obligation, it really does take on a different hue.  No longer does obligation suggest rules, orders and unwilling obedience.  With mercy attached to it, obligation becomes invitational and hopeful.  I realize not only do I oblige; I do it willingly and happily.

When I think about the word, obligation, it is easy to see the relational aspect.  If I am obligated to you, then you and I are in a relationship.  And the same is true if you are obligated to me.  I also realize not all obligations are one-on-one.  I think there are individuals obligated to groups.  And there are groups obligated to other groups.  So the idea of obligation is actually fairly complex.

The other thing I realize about obligation is recognizing I am, in fact, obligated even in situations where I don’t think it would occur to me to use the language of obligation.  Let me give a simple example.  When my first child was born, I suddenly was obligated in some significant ways.  Of course, there are laws that rightly say I can’t abuse her, that I have to feed her, etc.  But my sense of obligation went far above the letter of the law.

I felt obligated to care for her in the very best way I could.  I felt obligated to help her grow into a strong, independent young woman (we succeeded!).  There were educational obligations that I owned that certainly were not required.  She went to a more expensive school rather than some local options.  They would have been quite good, but she wanted something else.  I felt obligated to help her become her very best.

Moving to another example, I think a great deal about friendship.  I don’t think there are many laws governing friendship.  For the most part, friendships are an issue of voluntary free choices.  No one makes me be a friend.  And I can’t force someone else to become my friend.  But when two friends opt for that friendship, they necessarily also assume some obligations that go with friendship.  There is no legal contract that outlines the obligations of friendship.  All of us are on our own in our friendships.

When I think about my friendships, I realize there is the mercy of obligation.  This is a good deal for me!  If someone becomes my friend, in effect they willingly agree to be full of mercy for me.  They agree to be helpful and supportive.  Tacitly, they sign up for making my life better.  While they do not want me to mess us, if I do mess up, they will be there to help the situation and me be better.  The mercy of obligation means there should be an element of forgiveness when I do mess up.

The mercy of obligation means they should be willing to go the second mile with me.  This kind of friendship is a joy.  It is a joy because there is someone out there who is there for you.  There is someone who thinks you are pretty neat.  They want to be with you and they like you.  Often you are treated better than you deserve.  That is mercy.  I thank God for these kinds of friends and for their mercy.

And then I realize, friendship is a reciprocal relationship.  Not only am I the recipient of the mercy of obligation in my friendships, but I also am obliged in a similar way to my friends.  I can flip the phrase: I have been talking about the mercy of obligation and can now talk about the obligation of mercy.  That is what I owe my friends (and what I owed my daughter in the earlier example).  In agreeing to be a friend, I also agree to take on the obligation of mercy.

When the friendship is real, offering mercy is not that hard.  I say this, while recognizing that offering mercy can often be costly.  If my friend wrongs me somehow, being merciful with forgiveness is not easy.  But it is the right thing to do.  Offering mercy can feel very unbalanced.  If I offer mercy, it can seem like the other person won and I lost.  However, if I feel this way, then it really isn’t truly a friendship.  Friends are willing to lose if that means their friend wins.

The final truth of obligation and mercy is the good news that everyone is a winner.  Because friendship is mutual and reciprocal, the mercy obligation goes both ways.  Ultimately, no one loses and both win.  Thank God for friendship and the obligation that comes with friendship.  It is a chance to learn and experience mercy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.             Brooks’ article focused on the 2016 contentious election.   He provocatively suggests, “Read Buber, Not the Polls!”   I think Brooks puts

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was full of sports for me.   Commitment would have been presupposed t

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.   And other groups practice this spiri