Skip to main content

Happy to Serve

Richard Rohr is one of my favorite authors.  The Franciscan heads us a Center for Action and Contemplation in Albuquerque.  I have met him a couple times, but cannot call him a friend.  I have used his books in my classes and students generally find his thinking to be challenging and rewarding.  Since he is about my age, I know we have shared similar time frameworks, even though we have negotiated those from different perspectives.  I read him regularly.

Recently he posted a piece that had an initial line that riveted me.  Rohr said, “The only happy people I have ever met are those who have found some way to serve.”  I almost laughed out loud, not because I thought it was funny, so much as I found it such a bold statement.  I certainly know many people who have served and who are happy.  But I was not sure the bold statement from Rohr was fully accurate in my experience.  Sure, I thought, there must be some people who serve and who are sad?  And surely, there are happy people who have barely served a day in their life.  I wanted to pursue this a little more.

The first thing I wanted to ponder is whether you can be happy and hardly ever serve?  I know plenty of people who have not served very much.  It occurs to me to differentiate authentic service from being made to do something.  This helps.  I know many groups have a “service component” in their endeavor.  Even a football team can have a “service day” as part of the early season team-building exercise.  I am not belittling this, but I don’t really count this as service.  It is required and it is a onetime thing.

My college now has a “service learning” component in the graduation expectations.  Again, I think this is a good thing, but I don’t consider it service in the same way as the person who voluntarily puts himself or herself at the service of another.  A student doing service learning might be happy, but the fact is she or he is doing it because they have to do it---it is a course requirement.

I do think people can be happy and never serve.  But I doubt the happiness is deep and long lasting.  Life eventually gets ornery and sin, sickness or death can quickly and surely erode superficial happiness.  I think this is what Rohr begins to give voice.  There are superficial happy times.  My birthday is usually one of those times.  But the following day is not my birthday, so the happiness fades.

The other angle I also want to explore briefly.  Simply serving may not make me happy.  In saying this I realize we need to be clear about service.  It is a tricky word.  If I go to a restaurant, I get service.  The waiter is there to serve me.  To me it is service; to him it is a job.  He might be relatively happy doing his job---serving.  Or he might hate it.  I recognize that what we call service needs to be clarified.

This is where Rohr is helpful.  As I read a little further in his reflection, I realize he helps me see how we can use the idea of “service.”  Rohr says people involved in authentic service “are not preoccupied with self-image, success, and power.”  That thought is incredibly insightful.  It actually introduces the theme of intentionality behind service.  The kind of service about which Rohr talks is service that does not serve my ego.  It does not aim for my success.  And it is not about helping me get power or augment my power.

This enables me to see service in a way that is different than the restaurant server or the student doing service learning.  Rohr’s perspective helps us see the life of a Mother Teresa or Gandhi.  It helps me appreciate the many almost nameless Quakers and others I have seen in my growing up days.  These are the quiet saints among us.  And so often, they really are happy.  This was true, even to my young eyes, which could not understand “what was in it for them?”

The truth behind my question was either nothing was in it for them…or everything!  At first glance, they were serving and likely would get nothing out of it.  It was true they would get not ego boost, success or power.  Paradoxically, some of them did become famous---like Mother Teresa.  But that certainly was not her goal.  But what I suspect most of them got was happiness.

I have lived long enough to understand and appreciate Rohr’s insight.  If you want to be authentically happy---deeply and for long term---serve.  You don’t have to become a monk or a doormat.  You don’t have to serve for sixteen hours a day.  But serve.  Find a cause or someone who needs your care, your effort and your commitment.  Do it for the right reasons---because it needs to be done.  Give up your ego, your expectations and all other needs.

Simply give yourself. That is what service is.  Service is a gift of self.  In that sense it is like love.  And paradoxically, the more you give, the more you get.  Give yourself away and be happy.

Popular posts from this blog

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.There are liberals and conservatives.There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions. There are defining doctrines and religious practices.Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan, which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.Something like meditation would be a good example.Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.And other groups practice this spiritual discipline. A favorite way I like to …

A Pain is not a Pain

A rose may be a rose, but a pain is not a pain.  Maybe somebody has said that before, but I have never heard it.  So I am assuming (for the moment) I made it up.  Of course, most of us have heard that line, “a rose is a rose.”  I don’t know who said it first or if I should give it a footnote, but I do know that I did not create that line.  Furthermore, we all could explain what the phrase, a rose is a rose, means.

However, if I say, “a pain is not a pain,” the reader may not be too sure what I mean by that.  And if the reader is unsure, he or she does not know whether to agree with me or say balderdash!  So let me explain it by some development.

For sure, every adult knows what pain means.  It is difficult to imagine living into adulthood and not experiencing some kind of pain.  There is physical pain; we all know this.  There is emotional pain----a pain many people know all too well…and others may barely know.  There may be something like spiritual pain, but this one is tricky.  Not …

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”
The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.A committed person was someone to be admired.He was loyal and steady.Now a commitment is something you avoid.You don’t want to tie yourself down.”I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.
For example, growing up was full of sports for me.Commitment would have been presupposed to be part of a team. If you were going to pl…