There are
periodicals I routinely read just to be informed about certain areas in my
life. It is not just religion and
spirituality issues that I want to be up to date. I also have wide-ranging interests because I
know that a variety of interests make me a more interesting person. And if I have wide ranging interests, then I
am likely to be more creative. All
innovators know putting together things that are not necessarily linked
produces new possibilities.
One of the things I decided to do was regularly read some Catholic literature so I would be more informed and better able to participate with fellow Catholics in whatever community I lived. After all, if there are over one billion Catholics in the world, many of my neighbors will belong to that faith tradition. And I better well understand their perception and experience of God. I acknowledge somehow their God is my God. If they experience God in a variety of ways, I need to know about it and celebrate it. To that end, one thing I regularly read is the National Catholic Reporter, a weekly Catholic publication.
Over my
life I have applied this principle, although for a long time I would not have
known to call it innovative. Early in my
studies, I wanted to wander beyond my own Quaker tradition. As I spent time with people who were not like
me and read more widely in Christian history, I began to realize how narrow and
provincial I was. I am not sure how it
could have been any different. I grew up
on a farm with people who were mostly like me.
That was my “world.” Until you
know there is difference, you define things, as you know them.
My earliest
years were before Vatican II, that amazing global Catholic council in the late
50s and early 60s that dramatically opened up Catholicism and affected how
non-Catholics related to the Roman Catholic world. Little did I realize how much Vatican II
would affect me and my own little world.
There are many ways to describe it.
I would say my mind expanded. My
soul grew in ways that added depth and breadth.
My “world” got bigger.
One of the things I decided to do was regularly read some Catholic literature so I would be more informed and better able to participate with fellow Catholics in whatever community I lived. After all, if there are over one billion Catholics in the world, many of my neighbors will belong to that faith tradition. And I better well understand their perception and experience of God. I acknowledge somehow their God is my God. If they experience God in a variety of ways, I need to know about it and celebrate it. To that end, one thing I regularly read is the National Catholic Reporter, a weekly Catholic publication.
In a recent
edition I read a sermon by Thomas Gumbleton, who is the retired auxiliary
bishop of Detroit. He shared a story
that was charming and I would like to share.
It is the story about Judaism.
Gumbleton says, “I have a priest friend in another diocese who invited
an Orthodox rabbi to speak to his parishioners about Judaism. He explained
about the 613 laws of the Torah and how he faithfully keeps those laws. Someone
asked him about his belief in an afterlife. The rabbi said, “I believe everyone
eventually gets into heaven.”
Now I knew
things were going to get interesting.
Gumbleton continued. “Then people
raised their hands; they all had the same question, ‘Why do you keep all those
613 laws if you think everyone is going to get into heaven anyway?’ The rabbi
smiled and answered, ‘Because God has asked me to keep them.’” I laughed.
Even before I read on, immediately I thought, “of course; it’s a matter
of obedience.”
I think
obedience is a tough term in our culture.
Most of us don’t want to be obedient to anyone---to be “beholding,” as
my grandfather would put it. We want to
be independent. Indeed, why would be
bother with 613 laws if we were going to get the good stuff anyway? That seems stupid. And stupid is how so many folks think about
obedience.
But
Gumbleton adds a great twist that helps me understand obedience. He says, "It's a matter of friendship. If a friend asks you to do something, you do
it. In this case, you recognize that
what God is asking of you is for your own good. God asks and we respond. God loves and we
respond.” I love how he takes it into
the realm of friendship. That image of
friendship is one of my favorites for the God-human relationship. I like to understand God as friend. Of course, for a Christian this works very
well, particularly when Jesus enters the pictures. Jesus as friend is a powerful way to perceive
the relationship.
And
clearly, any one of us who values friendship knows if a friend asks for
something, we are going to try our hardest to do it. If a friend asks me to do something, I don’t
tell him that’s stupid. I don’t evaluate
how I feel about it. I respond. I act.
A friend is a person I love and I act out of love. That’s how it is with God.
As I step
back from the story, I realize it is a wonderful lesson of love. In our culture love can be sexualized to the
point of ridiculousness. Or it can
become so superficial, it is like the greeting of the waitress in a restaurant
who asks, “Love, what can I get you?”
The lesson
of love is not whether it is 613 laws or just one law. The lesson of love is friendship is a
relationship of responsibility and responsiveness. If my friend asks for something, I do
it. That's true for the best friend I
have: God
Comments
Post a Comment