Skip to main content

Spiritual Giants

Adam Grant is a relatively young scholar.  He teaches at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.  He focuses on psychology and management.  Anyone in the business world knows that Wharton is as famous as Harvard when it comes to business schools.  So professionally he is at the top of ladder.  However, the great thing about him is he has the ability to do interesting research and write about it in engaging ways for the non-expert.  Whenever he writes something, I want to read it.
           
Recently, he had an Op-Ed piece in the New York Times.  It had in intriguing title: “How to Raise a Creative Child. Step One: Back Off.”  Naturally, I jumped right into the reading of the thing.  The focus was on the highly gifted child.  They are the ones off the chart smart or talented.  They are prodigies---so far ahead of their peers it is ridiculous.  But where does it end?
           
Grant puts it pretty simply.  “Child prodigies rarely become adult geniuses who change the world.”  Instead of fame, they typically fizzle.  Grant thinks he has some reasons that explain this.  I like the way Grant describes their pilgrimage to normalcy.  He says, “What holds them back is that they don’t learn to be original.”  Instead of being a creative kid who turns into an adult genius who might make the world different, the kid is not inventive or innovative.
           
Grant suggests the reason for this.  He claims “They strive to earn the approval of their parents and the admiration of their teachers.”  The ways in which they are fabulously gifted can be showy, but ultimately nothing is produced.  Again, Grant puts it clearly.  “But as they perform in Carnegie Hall and become chess champions, something unexpected happens: Practice makes perfect, but it doesn’t make new.”
           
They may well become leaders in their field.  But they are not the ones who figure out how to do things in creative, new ways.  Ironically, Grant maintains, “Research suggests the most creative children are the least likely to become the teacher’s pet, and in response, may learn to keep their original ideas to themselves.”  Grant then moves to try to explain why the really gifted child may never be creative and the not-so-obvious creative kid becomes the big innovator or one who transforms the world in some fashion.
           
Grant turns to the parents for part of the explanation.  Surprisingly, a key difference was the number of rules parents had for their kids.  Generally speaking, highly creative children had far fewer rules from parents.  Grant concludes, “Creativity may be hard to nurture, but it’s easy to thwart.”  It was simple: “By limiting rules, parents encouraged their children to think for themselves.”
           
As I have experience in the field on innovation, I find Grant’s perspective makes sense.  I can even point to my own experience.  While I obviously never would have fit into the gifted child category, I am sure I spent way too much time and effort pleasing both my parents and teachers.  I became good, but not great.  I thwarted myself.  I am not down about that because I also have learned in small ways, at least, to become more innovative.
           
There is much more to say on this topic, but I want to switch to the spiritual side of the topic.  While many may not see any spiritual teaching from this, I immediately made some connections.  No one doubts that there have been some spiritual giants throughout history and, even, in our own time.  Most adults today think of Mother Teresa, Gandhi, Tutu and others from the 20th century.
           
I am confident every one of them would not have said they were spiritually gifted young children.  Seldom would a young one aspire to be a saint.    In fact, I am not even sure what the career path to being a saint would look like.  But I also think there are some hints to what normally happens.
           
A spiritual giant is one who comes to know deep in her or his heart a God who becomes so real to them that they are transformed from an ordinary spiritual person into an extraordinary person.  The normally have enough commitment and discipline to see their way into new ways radicalizing the world for God’s sake.  Often they work miracles from the humility of their station in life.  Seldom do they have the power of the politician or prince.
           
Their work is divinity, not domination.  It is not unusual for them to be misfits in society and, even, in the church.  They don’t do rules very well.  Rather they have become their own person---often their own person is as a transformed person of God.  Indeed through them and their action, God is present in the world and, frequently proclaiming a new kind of world that is not simply a better version of what exists.
           
It would be easy to acknowledge this, applaud this like we do the athletic prodigy, and then go home.  But in the spiritual world each and every one of us ultimately is being called into spiritual greatness.  To settle for less is to say no to part or, even, all of God’s call on our lives.  Too many of us are the parent of our inner child—thwarting any kind of spiritual genius each of us possesses.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.             Brooks’ article focused on the 2016 contentious election.   He provocatively suggests, “Read Buber, Not the Polls!”   I think Brooks puts

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was full of sports for me.   Commitment would have been presupposed t

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.   And other groups practice this spiri