Adam Grant is a relatively young scholar. He teaches at the Wharton School at the
University of Pennsylvania. He focuses
on psychology and management. Anyone in
the business world knows that Wharton is as famous as Harvard when it comes to
business schools. So professionally he
is at the top of ladder. However, the
great thing about him is he has the ability to do interesting research and
write about it in engaging ways for the non-expert. Whenever he writes something, I want to read
it.
Recently, he had an Op-Ed piece in the New York Times. It had in intriguing title: “How to Raise a
Creative Child. Step One: Back Off.”
Naturally, I jumped right into the reading of the thing. The focus was on the highly gifted
child. They are the ones off the chart
smart or talented. They are
prodigies---so far ahead of their peers it is ridiculous. But where does it end?
Grant puts it pretty simply.
“Child prodigies rarely become adult geniuses who change the
world.” Instead of fame, they typically
fizzle. Grant thinks he has some reasons
that explain this. I like the way Grant
describes their pilgrimage to normalcy. He
says, “What holds them back is that they don’t learn to be original.” Instead of being a creative kid who turns into
an adult genius who might make the world different, the kid is not inventive or
innovative.
Grant suggests the reason for this. He claims “They strive to earn the approval
of their parents and the admiration of their teachers.” The ways in which they are fabulously gifted
can be showy, but ultimately nothing is produced. Again, Grant puts it clearly. “But as they perform in Carnegie Hall and
become chess champions, something unexpected happens: Practice makes perfect,
but it doesn’t make new.”
They may well become leaders in their field. But they are not the ones who figure out how
to do things in creative, new ways.
Ironically, Grant maintains, “Research suggests the most creative
children are the least likely to become the teacher’s pet, and in response, may
learn to keep their original ideas to themselves.” Grant then moves to try to explain why the
really gifted child may never be creative and the not-so-obvious creative kid
becomes the big innovator or one who transforms the world in some fashion.
Grant turns to the parents for part of the explanation. Surprisingly, a key difference was the number
of rules parents had for their kids.
Generally speaking, highly creative children had far fewer rules from
parents. Grant concludes, “Creativity
may be hard to nurture, but it’s easy to thwart.” It was simple: “By limiting rules, parents
encouraged their children to think for themselves.”
As I have experience in the field on innovation, I find
Grant’s perspective makes sense. I can
even point to my own experience. While I
obviously never would have fit into the gifted child category, I am sure I
spent way too much time and effort pleasing both my parents and teachers. I became good, but not great. I thwarted myself. I am not down about that because I also have
learned in small ways, at least, to become more innovative.
There is much more to say on this topic, but I want to
switch to the spiritual side of the topic.
While many may not see any spiritual teaching from this, I immediately
made some connections. No one doubts
that there have been some spiritual giants throughout history and, even, in our
own time. Most adults today think of
Mother Teresa, Gandhi, Tutu and others from the 20th century.
I am confident every one of them would not have said they
were spiritually gifted young children.
Seldom would a young one aspire to be a saint. In fact, I am not even sure what the career
path to being a saint would look like.
But I also think there are some hints to what normally happens.
A spiritual giant is one who comes to know deep in her or
his heart a God who becomes so real to them that they are transformed from an
ordinary spiritual person into an extraordinary person. The normally have enough commitment and
discipline to see their way into new ways radicalizing the world for God’s
sake. Often they work miracles from the
humility of their station in life. Seldom
do they have the power of the politician or prince.
Their work is divinity, not domination. It is not unusual for them to be misfits in
society and, even, in the church. They
don’t do rules very well. Rather they
have become their own person---often their own person is as a transformed person
of God. Indeed through them and their
action, God is present in the world and, frequently proclaiming a new kind of
world that is not simply a better version of what exists.
It would be easy to acknowledge this, applaud this like we
do the athletic prodigy, and then go home.
But in the spiritual world each and every one of us ultimately is being
called into spiritual greatness. To
settle for less is to say no to part or, even, all of God’s call on our
lives. Too many of us are the parent of
our inner child—thwarting any kind of spiritual genius each of us possesses.
Comments
Post a Comment