Her name was Anna Kurzwell and I had never heard of
her. In fact it would have been
virtually impossible for me to hear about her if I did not regularly read the
National Catholic Reporter. I like
reading periodicals like this in order to stay somewhat informed on the world’s
news. I don’t read all the articles, but
apparently my eyes glance over most of the titles. I was grabbed by this title: “Kansas City
teacher astonishes with a $2 million gift to the Jesuits.” “Those lucky rascals,” I thought!
I like the Jesuits and I respect them. Although I am not Catholic and never went to
a Catholic school, I have had a couple Jesuits as faculty. They were smart and well trained. In fact our current Pope Francis is a
Jesuit. The Jesuits’ official title is the
Society of Jesus. If you see a SJ after
a priest’s name, that means he is a Jesuit.
They were founded in the sixteenth century by Ignatius of Loyola. They are distinctive in that they owe
obedience to the Pope. So they are free
from many of the local constraints that often hamper other Catholic leaders.
But I had never heard of Anna Kurzwell. And why would I? She was a little known teacher outside of
Kansas City. Not in a million years would
anyone have expected that she would be a millionaire. She was 101 when she died. She was the youngest of eight children. Early in her life she had spent some time in
a convent. She had spent one summer
working in a leper colony in New Guinea.
In her later years she traveled to other parts of the globe.
As a teacher, she had never earned more than $20,000. She volunteered for a shelter and helped
facilitate other worthwhile endeavors. I
come away with a sense that Anna Kurzwell was a remarkable woman, but also a
remarkably unremarkable woman. She ended
life by living on a $1,000 monthly pension.
No one had a clue about her wealth.
And I am sure she offered no clues.
The writers of the article, Sally Morrow and David Gibson,
are no doubt correct when they say, “the Catholic faith was the golden thread
that ran through her life.” I am sure
this is true. I have known Quakers about
whom the same thing can be said. I am
sure she would have told us that her faith and her church were crucial to her
life. In fact, it would be impossible to
understand her life apart from faith and the church. Doubtlessly, she was committed to God and
committed to sharing what God had provided her.
In most ways it does not matter that the Jesuits were the
beneficiaries of the largesse. It could
have been any worthy group. And that is
because the story is about Anna Kurzwell, not the Jesuits. It is the story of commitment, a life of
service rooted in her dedication, and a generosity of spirit. Her whole life was a life of giving. She gave to countless 4 and 5th
grade students throughout her years. I
suspect she gave more than the required hours to teach.
I am now painting the picture I have of her. I suspect it is, in part, accurate and likely
bigger than life, too. I would like to
think her financial generosity to the Jesuits is simply one more thing---and
the last thing---that fit a pattern of her life’s service. No one knew she had this kind of wealth. But thinking about it should cause us to get
over our surprise.
No one who commits, even for a short time, to life in a
convent is going to become a spendthrift when she leaves. And she left the convent to take care of a
sick and dying mother. She wanted the simple life because that was the life
Jesus lived. She lived according to need
and experienced the freedom that folks with a commitment to simplicity
feel. She was not a slave to her
passions. She was free---free to give
generously. And she did it in a way that
caused no fanfare---at least for her!
I am glad that I did not need to know her personally to be
inspired by her story. Stories
inspire. To be inspired by Anna Kurzwell
does not mean I have to do exactly as she did.
I don’t have her wealth. But I
can be rich in the Spirit as she was.
Because I live, I still have a chance to give---to give of myself and my
gifts. Most of my gifts are not
monetary. And I suspect, her gifts of
love, service and encouragement were worth more than $2 million. That just
happened to be her financial worth.
Her spiritual worth was significantly more. Fortunately, it cannot be measured in dollars
and cents. I do suspect she got her
reward. I rather doubt she got too many
awards or, maybe, even thank yous. But I
know that the kind of generosity she bestowed brings its own blessing. I am confident she was a very blessed
woman. I hope she knew it.
Generosity---especially when it is freely given without
strings attached---is always a blessing.
There is no hidden agenda; there is no source of pride. It is clean.
And it is always a blessing. The
lesson for us is to learn this kind of generosity. Be generous in a pure and detached way. And blessing will surely come your way---the
blessing of generosity.
You were my favorite Professor during my time at BW and I recall the wonderfulness of your spirit each time I read your posts. May you continue to be abundantly blessed.
ReplyDelete