I saw the title of a recent blog and knew I immediately
would read it. The title made a simple
statement: “Doctors Fail to Address Patient’s Spiritual Needs.” I suspected that was the case, but it is not
a conversation I ever had with any physicians.
So I began to read with interest.
The story begins with a doctor describing a young woman in
her 20s he is treating for cancer. She
was not responding well to the treatments and he feared the worst for her
future. He begins to narrate some
details. He acknowledged that he noticed
that she and her mother, who visited daily, wore tiny gold crosses. She also had a picture of Jesus at her
bedside. Robert Klitzman, the doctor,
set the story for its context. But the
next few sentences made the article significant.
He said, “I wondered: Should I call a priest? Should I ask her if she wanted to see
one? I wasn’t sure, and didn’t even know
how to raise the topic.” This confession
touched me. I have huge respect for
physicians. My daughter is one. I know the incredible training they
undergo. They are expected to manage
important situations they find themselves asked to address. And I also know they have their own human
limitations. They are not god.
In effect, this is what Klitzman is confessing. He claims to be a doctor, but not god. He continued to write in a touching
fashion. “I was raised Jewish, and had no
idea about when to call a priest, or what doing so might imply. I feared that if I raised the issue, she and
her mother would feel that I was giving up on her. So for a few weeks, I did nothing. But every time I visited her, I felt bad.” Reading those words made him feel very human.
I found his next step a bit humorous. He decided to ask the resident with whom he was
working. He tried to be nonchalant when
he posed the question: “Do we ever call a priest?” It was even funnier to hear the resident’s
response: “That is simply not something we ever did as physicians.” I can almost hear a resounding, “case
closed,” sound in the background.
Klitzman continues by noting some studies that seemingly
demonstrate that talking about religion or spirituality often aids the healing
process. And particularly for
end-of-life patients talking about this subject can be very important. The thing I appreciate about Klitzman is his
honesty. He is using his experience to
continue to learn and figure out how to be even more effective as a physician
and human being.
He realizes that he does not have to be religious to talk
about religion with a patient. That is a
huge step. We all have
limitations---limitations in the knowledge we have, the boundaries our beliefs
put on us and, hence, limit us and clearly the limitations of our own
experience. I certainly resonate with
this. I know the limitations I have and
how they affect my job.
I am as willing to talk with people about religion and
spirituality as Klitzman is unwilling.
However, I am under no illusion that merely talking about this kind of
thing is going to heal someone from cancer or make a damaged heart healthy
again. In fact, I may be particularly
effective in end-of-life contexts. And
we all know that at some point all humans are going to die. Sooner or later, we all have end-of-life
issues.
As I thought about what Klitzman was sharing with me, I
realized that I offer a kind of spiritual medicine. I don’t offer pills and give no shots. Most of what I offer feels indirect and
certainly not flashy. But I think it can
be healing. And healing is the key
idea. I have thought quite a bit about
healing. Healing always leads to some
sense of wellness. Wellness is different
than being physically ok. In fact I
might not be physically ok, but I can be well.
Finally, we can all be well even at the point of death. Personally, that is my goal: to be able to
die well. Paradoxically, even though I
probably will be sick, I can be well.
That is where spiritual medicine comes into the
picture. It may not cure cancer, but
spiritual medicine can cure a sick soul.
And I have learned that many physically healthy people have sick
souls. In my experience, spiritual
medicine often takes the form of offering folks a sense of meaning in
life. Sometimes it offers a deep sense
of belonging. That does not imply an
atheist cannot have meaning and a sense of belonging. But spirituality surely offers these.
Another significant aspect of spiritual medicine for me is
the ego transcending nature of the medicine.
By this I mean the awareness and comfort that I am not the center of the
universe---even my little universe. In
the best sense of the word, spiritual medicine puts me in my place. I come to have a solid, non-egoistic sense of
identity. If this can be linked to some
meaning and blessed with a sense of belonging, then I am going to be well in
any context life may place me.
I would like to meet Dr. Klitzman. I would like to team up with him and help him
address patient’s spiritual needs. We
all have spiritual needs. I know there
is spiritual medicine to offer.
Comments
Post a Comment