Who am I? That is a
question almost everyone entertains and, perhaps, spends a good deal of time in
life figuring out the answer. It is not
unusual for us to come up with a few different answers in the process of living
our lives. I am confident I would have
answered that question differently when I was ten years old than I would today
as a relatively mature, older guy.
I know there are some religious traditions that scoff at the
idea there is even a real me. For
example, Buddhists question whether there can ever be a self or a real me. Of course, we can pretend there is one; we
can act as if there is one. In my world
of illusion I can have a self-illusion.
I am sure there are some psychologists who do not believe there is such
a thing as a real me. I am hoping they
are not correct.
As a Christian and Quaker, I am captivated by the early
Genesis creation account that humans are created in the image and likeness of
the Divine One. I value that affirmation
and hope in some sense it is true. Along
with the early theologians of the Christian Church, I can understand that I
have lost the likeness to God. Through
sin and other human foibles, I am more unlike God than I am like God. My spiritual pilgrimage is to grow more and
more into that likeness. But I never
lost the image. Even in the midst of my
bad news, the good news remained that I bear the imago Dei---the image of God.
Since I have lost the likeness of God, I wonder if that has
not played a role in my quest for the question, who am I? Since I am not like God, I am not sure who I
am. At birth we are given a name, but
not an identity. Early childhood years
find people telling me who I am or giving me identifiable taglines to use to
describe my identity. In my case I was a
farm boy, a fairly bright guy, a good boy, etc.
These became part of my answer to the question, who am I.
But at some point---and I think it was in high school---I
became uneasy about these more superficial identity badges. I did not think they were wrong; in many
cases, I was all of them. But the were
not the real me. And at that point, it
is appropriate to say I had an identity crisis.
Perhaps calling it a crisis gives it too much drama. There was not much drama; there was a great
deal of befuddlement. I simply was not
sure who I was!
The real me question has interested me since high
school. I like the way the 20th
century monk, Thomas Merton, dealt with it.
Merton talks a great deal about the “true self.” Merton’s words have become well known to
me. “For me,” wrote Merton, “to be a
saint is to be myself. Therefore the
problem of sanctity and salvation is in fact the problem of finding out who I
am and of discovering my true self.” That
has been an apt and wonderful way to talk about my journey spiritually through
life. It has been a quest to discover my
true self and to live out that truth in my world. I hope I am making progress.
Other philosophers, theologians and psychologists have been
on the same quest. A recent book given
to me by a friend has a whole chapter on this kind of quest. John Neafsey authored a book with a title I
very much like: A Sacred Voice is Calling. For Neafsey, there is a link between the
Sacred Voice and our discovery of our true self or the real me. One of the points Neafsey deals with is
exactly how it is that we discover our true self? How will we know “that’s it?”
Neafsey suggests we will know, in part, by “a felt sense of authenticity.” That resonated with me: if it feels
authentic, you are on the right path.
Then he quotes William James to make his point. “I have often thought that the best way to
define a person’s character would be to seek out the particular mental or moral
attitude in which, when it came upon them, they felt most deeply and intensely
active and alive. At such moments there
is a voice inside which speaks and says, ‘This is the real me.’” Again that resonated with me.
Personally, I doubt that anyone can know with absolute
certainty “this is the real me.” But I
do think we can be very confident that we know it. That confidence will come with a high degree
of authenticity. I believe James is
correct when he says we will feel most deeply and intensely active and alive.
I would add that this sense of the real me will endure over
time. This contrasts with a simple
mountaintop experience when I tend to feel this deep and intense
aliveness. A mountaintop experience is
short-term. The real me endures over
time. It endures through thick and
thin. It can suffer and it exalts. It is not contingent upon my
circumstances. It is not conditional.
Likely, I will always be fascinated by the question, who am
I? Merton is correct in my opinion: to
find myself means I also find God. That
is my quest.
Comments
Post a Comment