I confess to liking the way columnist, David Brooks, thinks
and writes. I read almost every piece he
writes in the New York Times. I have
never met him nor have I been to hear him speak. I would enjoy doing both, but until then, I
am left to read what appears in newspapers and other media. He recently wrote a piece entitled, “The
Devotion Leap.” I had no clue what the
title might mean. I suspected it was
something on politics or the global situation.
Even in these ponderings, I find what brings to bear philosophically
and, even, religiously is fascinating.
But my guess was wrong.
The first line of the article immensely surprised me. “The online dating site OkCupid asks its
clients to rate each other’s attractiveness on a scale of 1 to 5.” Wow, I did not see this one coming! I was tempted not to read further. I am at the age where dating services are of
no interest and even less help to me!
Besides, the last thing I want to know is how other folks are going to
rate me on an attractiveness scale. I am
sure the truth would hurt!
My fears were born out.
The median rating by women for men was between 1 and 2. “Only 1 in 6 guys was rated as having above
average looks.” Again, I was ready to
ditch the article. There is no way I am
going to be that one guy rated above average looking! But because I trust Brooks, I
persevered. Soon he began making some
sense as he made me interested in what he was thinking.
When I came upon the following lines, I sensed it was true,
but was a little troubled by the implications.
Brooks writes, “They’re
shopping for human beings, commodifying people. They have access to very little information
that can help them judge if they will fall in love with this person. They pay ridiculous amounts of attention to
things like looks, which have little bearing on whether a relationship will
work.” Of course, this is not bad and I
know people who have met their spouses through online sites. But the thought of “commodifying people”
unnerves me. In a different context,
that strikes me as not spiritual. And
this leads me to the end of Brooks’ article where the philosophical and
religious conclusions are found.
I
understand that people going to an online site to find a significant other is
operating with some level of self-interest.
I would, too. Again, there is
nothing wrong with that; I do things out of self-interest all the time. But there is another level humans are capable
of achieving and this is where the spiritual tends to enter the picture. And this is where I pick up words from Brooks
that underscore why I like him so much.
The
shift from what I am calling self-interest to other-interest is typical of
people acting spiritually. This
predictably happens with love. Saying as
much leads us to recognize that it is desire for love that normally drives
folks to online dating sites. And many
find love. And it is a different form of
love that leads to different kinds of expressions. I like the way Brooks analyzes it.
He says,
“In love, of course, the
shift starts with vulnerability, not calculation. The people involved move from
selfishness to service, from prudent thinking to poetic thinking, from a state
of selection to a state of need, from relying on conscious thinking to relying
on their own brilliant emotions.” He
offers powerful insight with these two sentences. Spiritual love is grounded in
vulnerability. We are sitting ducks for
the Spirit and to God’s people in the world.
We are pushed toward service. We
become willing to give and, if needed, to give sacrificially.
Brooks
helps us see how the spiritual aspect of being human is under duress. He notes, “When you look at all the people
looking for love and vocation today, you realize we live in a culture and an
online world that encourages a very different mind-set; in a technical culture
in which humanism, religion and the humanities, which are the great instructors
of enchantment, are not automatically central to life.” I really like this focus on enchantment.
I see
enchantment to be the work of the Spirit.
Of course, people looking for love often begin with a sense of
enchantment. Perhaps being attractive is
one form of enchantment. But I see
enchantment much more deeply.
Enchantment is related to intrigued and, even, captivated. God is the ultimate source of
enchantment. I am even willing to see
God as the Ultimate Enchanter! And God’s
world is an enchanted world. The
spiritual life is the beginning of the enchanted life.
I think
that people who begin to live spiritually begin to have enchanted lives. They are attracted to the kinds of things God
is attracted to. And they are enchanted
by the kinds of ministries and services that God would do. A spiritual enchantment leads people to work
in soup kitchens and things like that. A
spiritual person is an enchanted person.
Enchanted
people are more engaging people. They
are willing to jump in and to stick with what needs to be done. They will be more satisfied. Spiritual enchantment is highly
desirable. Everyone who opts for it will
be highly attractive. That is good news.
Comments
Post a Comment