Skip to main content

Language of the Spirit


Stories often communicate big ideas more effectively than extended commentaries in flowery prose.  So let me begin with a story about language of the Spirit.  However good the story is, its connection to the language of the Spirit is implicit.  I will have to offer some commentary to make that clear.

I’ll preface the story by saying that I know a few languages.  At one point, I was nearly fluent in German, having spent a year in Germany at a university.  However, like so many things, if you don’t use it, it becomes very rusty.  When it comes to speaking and reading German now, I feel like a cripple.  And I can read two or three other languages, thanks to requirements to get my doctoral degree.  The story I want to tell necessitates knowing some Portuguese, which I do not.

Portuguese is necessary because the story took place in Brazil.  On numerous occasions I joined my colleague for a short teaching excursion to Curitiba, Brazil, where our university had a relationship with a Franciscan university.  Fortunately, we could teach English.  I remember so many evenings walking to the university, only to be greeted by a throng of elementary school kids.  The Franciscans also ran a huge elementary school on the same site. 

The name of the elementary school was a good religious name, Bom Jesus.  In Portuguese “bom” means “good;” hence the school was called “Good Jesus.”  I know just enough Portuguese to have figured out that and, so, it did not seem strange.  So I thought nothing about it.  One day my colleague was telling about the time his young son was with him.  When the son, who was in elementary school himself, saw the sign on the school and asked about it, he was dutifully told the name was “Bom Jesus.”

At once he asked, “But dad, why do they want to bomb Jesus!”  Of course, that is amusing…and understandable.  Had he been in France, good would be “bon.”  And in Spain good is “buena.”  Neither of those suggests “bombing Jesus.”  I like stories like these because I am fascinated with the nature and function of language.  Language is such an amazing gift for humans and, yet, language can at times be perilous.

If we know the language, it is a real gift.  We can talk with each other; we can “say” so much.  Nuance is possible.  We can “get to know” each other.  I feel like I can tell you who I am and you can do the same.  I can even say something like, “I love you,” and hope both of us “get” the profundity of that confession.  Perhaps too often I have said, “I understand you perfectly.” 

All this led me to begin thinking about the language of the Spirit.  We could assume the Spirit’s language is Hebrew or Greek, since those are the original biblical languages.  But this may simply be the Jewish or Christian assumption.  Perhaps the Muslim is sure the Spirit’s language is Arabic.  And so the assuming could go.  All this caused me to think more deeply about the language of the Spirit.

I am assuming the Spirit does have language or else there would be nothing communicable between us and the Spirit.  I have no problem thinking the Spirit can be translated into a variety of the human languages.  Clearly, the Christian Bible is translated into countless languages.  We could read multiple ones and see what each language tells us is the word for “spirit.”

This would not be much help.  I could know many different words for ‘spirit,’ but that does not actually tell us much about Spirit.  (I capitalize it here to indicate Spirit as some aspect of the Divinity---the Holy One).  The word “Spirit” simply is trying to name or point to a reality that is more than a vocal utterance.  And ah-ha, there was my clue.  The reality of the Spirit is not a vocal utterance---a word in whatever language.  The language of the Spirit is action, not words.

Let’s keep it simple.  Let’s assume the most profound language of the Spirit is the action of love.  You can imagine, as well as I can, the range of human actions that “convey” love.  I can say, “I love you.”  But I can also care for you; I can hug you.  And the range is huge.  At the big end of love, I can act lovingly toward a stranger or even an enemy. 

When I look at Jesus, that is what I see him “saying.”  In fact, he did it more with action than words.  His ultimate expression of this action of love was supremely sacrificial.  It is conveyed for Christians with the simply word, “cross.”  That is a powerful word that points to the profundity of a loving action that should leave us all speechless.

Join me in thinking about how else the language of the Spirit gets expressed.  Join me in committing to learn this language.  Let’s become more and more articulate with the language of the Spirit.  Together we could begin the making of a new world---which is the vision of Jesus.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.             Brooks’ article focused on the 2016 contentious election.   He provocatively suggests, “Read Buber, Not the Polls!”   I think Brooks puts

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was full of sports for me.   Commitment would have been presupposed t

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.   And other groups practice this spiri