I have often
said that religion is one way of making meaning in life. And I do believe that. Religion offers a perspective on the world
and on life that paints a picture to show how we understand ourselves in that
world. Of course not everyone has a
religion or shares a religious perspective.
It is very easy and quite acceptable today for someone to be an
atheist. Atheism also is a way of making
meaning in life.
Sometimes
that bothers a few of my religious friends.
They do not think atheism is a way to make meaning in life. Simply because they are religious, they
cannot imagine any other way to do it.
With this perspective, religion is the only way to make meaning. I understand that perspective; I don’t share
it. I don’t share it, in part, because I
do not think I can be the one who defines what counts as meaning. For example, if I am to assume that you have
to be religious to have meaning, then I am going to tell an atheist that he or
she cannot possibly have meaning---even if they think they do have meaning in
their lives. Somehow it strikes me as
odd to tell someone who thinks they have meaning that, in fact, they don’t!
I am pretty
sure there are many non-religious persons who are quite sure they have a life
of meaning and life of meaning does not have God in the middle. Far be it from me to tell them they are lying
to themselves. If they think they have
meaning, I am willing to say, “Yep, you probably have meaning.” I would also add, “and the way you have
meaning is different than the way I do it.”
I am happy to
talk about religion. That should not be
surprising since I teach it! Indeed, I
have a great deal of fun teaching religion.
I don’t try to convert anyone. I
figure that is God’s job! My job is to
talk about the various ways religion makes meaning. And I can also talk about how various
religious traditions make meaning in somewhat different ways. Who is to say a Buddhist or Hindu makes
meaning in the same way I do as a Christian and Quaker?
All this led me
back to some words I once read from the late novelist, Kurt Vonnegut. Vonnegut was a native Hoosier, so perhaps
that made him important to me. He died
in 2007, but before that he wrote a number of novels and other things. He was not your typical kind of guy. He often had a biting way of describing the
world, but he made you think.
It was his
one-liner about meaning that caused him to come into my mind again, as I am
reflecting on the purpose of human life.
He offers an alternative to religion or atheism. Vonnegut says, “A
purpose of human life, no matter who is controlling it, is to love whoever is
around to be loved.” There are a number
of things in the one-liner to be noted.
The first thing to note is the lack of arrogance on
Vonnegut’s part. He says “a” purpose of
human life. He does not say, “this is
the only purpose of human life.” He
allows other purposes. I like that. Who’s to say how many purposes in life there
might be? And cannot any one human being
have more than one purpose?
The phrase in Vonnegut’s quotation that is a bit puzzling is
the phrase that says, “no matter who is controlling it.” I doubt that Vonnegut meant God in this
instance. Perhaps God does control
things, but that is a theological assumption.
In my theology God is not a controlling divinity. I believe human beings were created with free
will. Of course, there are some things
in life that we cannot change---regardless of how much free will we have. But basically we have choices. And I think God is a respecter of our
choices. Of course, our choices have
consequences.
The last part of Vonnegut’s quotation is the heart of
it. The purpose of human life is to love
whoever is around. I think God would
love this perspective. It represents how
God acts in the world. Whoever is
around, God loves. What if we took this
seriously?
We could not have enemies!
We could not hate people. It
means our intentions would need to be creative and not destructive. Everyone knows that loving somebody or
something does not always mean, “liking” them or it. But love builds up; it does not tear
down.
Comments
Post a Comment