Somebody once said that we are known by the company we
keep. To an extent, I think this is
probably true. I would be happy to be
known by the range of friends that I have.
I have some very good people I call friends. To be associated with them is a
privilege. But we can take this even
further.
It might also be true that we are known by the people we
read. No doubt, the folks that we read
do inform us. And often, they form
us. There is no question but what I have
been influenced mightily by the various spiritual writers I have read over the
decades. I think this is especially true
in our younger years when we are being formed as people. But hopefully, we continue to grow even into
our “silver years.”
I would call this a form of continuing revelation. Calling it such is not meant to take on the
tricky issue of biblical authority. As I
want to use the phrase, continuing revelation, I simply mean an ongoing
relationship with authors, ideas and my own personal growth. I very much hope I can continue this growth
trajectory until I am no longer able to read and interact.
By growth I do not mean that we necessarily keep changing
our minds. To the contrary, a good bit
of personal growth is not changing our minds so much as it is getting some
intellectual, emotional and spiritual depth.
Effective growth might be stabilizing as much as it is change. My hope is that I might grow more and more
into the truth that I come to see and understand.
That’s why yesterday’s reading was fascinating. I felt exposed to some deeper truth that
resonated with what I felt I already knew.
And it came rather unexpectedly from two sources I happened to be
reading. I was reading to be
informed. And in the process personal
and spiritual formation happened. I am
always grateful for this experience.
The first source came from the daily newspaper I read. Early morning hour with coffee and sports
page is not typically the venue for continuing revelation. I was reading a story about the collegiate
football powerhouse, Ohio State. Since I
am not a native Buckeye, I lack the passion for this football phenomenon that
some colleagues manifest. So I was
rather casually reading about the famous coach, Urban Meyer.
Suddenly a sentence jumped out at me with a kind of
resounding truth that I gulped my coffee.
It was a basic truth, but it deepened my conviction of how true it
really is. Meyer said, “Routine is something
that is undervalued.” I agree with Coach
Meyer that routine is extremely important.
Routine is the heart of discipline.
In my case it is not football; it is spiritual discipline. It is clear to me that we succeed with
spiritual discipline when we are able to establish a routine.
Routine is crucial because it enables us to continue being
engaged with the discipline even when we may not want to do it. When we are in a routine, we don’t have to
decide every day or every occasion whether we want to do something. Routine is like a favorite friend who nudges
and nourishes us toward good things.
Routine is like a good friend helping us to do good things. Well said,
coach!
Then later in the day, I turned to my favorite monk, Thomas
Merton. Unlike Coach Meyer, Merton is
deceased. But that does not mean his
words do not ring just as true. I was
reading one of his books from the early 50s and hit this sentence. Merton quips, “Duty does not have to be
dull.” Once again, this rang so true to
me.
It seems like duty has a bad reputation these days. Many folks shun duty, if they possibly
can. Freedom is more important. Duty gets in our way of doing what we
want. And yet, there is a time-honored
role for duty. I link duty with
obligation. And it often means something
I “have” to do. But it does not have to
be solely a drill sergeant mentality. Let’s cite two instances of duty that come
out of our freedom.
In the first instance, if I have chosen and developed a
friendship, then I have an obligation---a duty---to nurture and cherish that
friendship. I “owe” it to my friend to be
faithful, helpful, etc. And my friend
has the same duty to me---thankfully.
Secondly, I think of my duty to the Holy One. If I have entered into a relationship with
God, then I have freely assumed an obligation---a duty---to be faithful,
loving, etc. Duty is a delight in this
case. To shun my duty is to be untrue to
the relationship and to my belief. Duty
is healthy and delightful. As Merton
says, duty does not have to be dull.
Well said, monk!
I appreciate my monk friend and my football coach for the
truths they speak. They give me a new
appreciation for two rock solid convictions about human relationships and
activity. Much depends on routine and on
duty. I am happy to be known by the
company I keep---monks, coaches and truth seekers.
Comments
Post a Comment