Skip to main content

The Idea of Community

Probably most of my adult life I have valued the idea of community.  I am not sure where or how that valuation happened.  I do know the idea of community is generally important within Quaker spirituality.  However, I think that would give me more credit than I deserve to suggest I got this at an early age! 

Oddly enough, I suspect part of my attraction of the idea of community is related to sports.  I played team sports and liked that aspect of the athletic life.  I liked “being in it together” with other guys.  When I was older, I played on mixed softball teams so enjoyed being in it together with other guys and gals.  I found it much more fun to win when I was with others.  And it certainly is easy to experience losing when you are in it with others.  Nobody talks about this as community---but I think it is a form of community. 

So for fifty years, I have valued the idea of community.  I have actually been aware of and appreciative of this idea of community for quite some time---probably forty of those fifty years.  I have read about it, talked about it, tried to form and nurture community.  Sometimes, the experience of community was effective and other times it only seemed to be malformed. 

I am sure part of my attraction to the monks and the monastic life---Christian and otherwise---is the focus on community.  The Buddhists have a term for it, Sangha.  Buddhism has three key elements: the Buddha, the teaching, and Sangha (community).  I don’t think it is far-fetched to see a comparable trio of elements in Christianity: Jesus, the teaching, and community. 

At some point, however, community becomes “the Church.”  I have never been quite comfortable with the idea of Church.  The word tends to suggest an institution, rules, etc.  It is no wonder younger people either have little interest or are wary of “the Church.”  I have always looked for ways to put the two together: community and Church. 

And then yesterday, I ran into a great quotation by Thomas Merton, my favorite monk of the 20th century.  In a journal entry from 1963 Merton writes these words: “How can the idea of ‘Church’ make any sense without this trust in man as capable of grace, capable of cooperation?  Here’s the real beginning of the idea of community.”  Merton puts the two together: community and Church.  Furthermore, he points to a key building block of community (and the Church). 

It is obvious that human beings are the building blocks of community.  But more needs to be said than that.  Essentially, Merton says community begins and is sustained by trusting humans as capable of grace.  That is so insightful.  Without grace community will not form and without grace, community certainly cannot grow and be sustained over time.

And when humans lose the capability of being graceful, the community is doomed.  It may take a while to die, but community is doomed. So we can work on community by encouraging and cultivating the graciousness of human beings.   

The other key element Merton identifies is trusting that humans are capable of cooperation.  So true!  People who refuse to cooperate are communal cancers.  Any coach knows that fact.  Can folks be taught to cooperate?  I think so.  Can they be forced?  Probably for a while, but with resentment.  And resentment infects any possibility for authentic community. 

I still love the idea of community.  But I now know the role grace and cooperation play in the formation of community. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.             Brooks’ article focused on the 2016 contentious election.   He provocatively suggests, “Read Buber, Not the Polls!”   I think Brooks puts
1 comment
Read more

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was full of sports for me.   Commitment would have been presupposed t
6 comments
Read more

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.   And other groups practice this spiri
3 comments
Read more