Probably most of my adult life I have valued the idea of
community. I am not sure where or how
that valuation happened. I do know the
idea of community is generally important within Quaker spirituality. However, I think that would give me more
credit than I deserve to suggest I got this at an early age!
Oddly enough, I suspect part of my attraction of the idea of
community is related to sports. I played
team sports and liked that aspect of the athletic life. I liked “being in it together” with other
guys. When I was older, I played on
mixed softball teams so enjoyed being in it together with other guys and
gals. I found it much more fun to win
when I was with others. And it certainly
is easy to experience losing when you are in it with others. Nobody talks about this as community---but I
think it is a form of community.
So for fifty years, I have valued the idea of
community. I have actually been aware of
and appreciative of this idea of community for quite some time---probably forty
of those fifty years. I have read about
it, talked about it, tried to form and nurture community. Sometimes, the experience of community was
effective and other times it only seemed to be malformed.
I am sure part of my attraction to the monks and the
monastic life---Christian and otherwise---is the focus on community. The Buddhists have a term for it, Sangha. Buddhism has
three key elements: the Buddha, the teaching, and Sangha (community). I don’t think it is far-fetched to see a
comparable trio of elements in Christianity: Jesus, the teaching, and
community.
At some point, however, community becomes “the Church.” I have never been quite comfortable with the
idea of Church. The word tends to
suggest an institution, rules, etc. It
is no wonder younger people either have little interest or are wary of “the
Church.” I have always looked for ways
to put the two together: community and Church.
And then yesterday, I ran into a great quotation by Thomas
Merton, my favorite monk of the 20th century. In a journal entry from 1963 Merton writes
these words: “How can the idea of ‘Church’ make any sense without this trust in
man as capable of grace, capable of cooperation? Here’s the real beginning of the idea of
community.” Merton puts the two together:
community and Church. Furthermore, he
points to a key building block of community (and the Church).
It is obvious that human beings are the building blocks of
community. But more needs to be said
than that. Essentially, Merton says
community begins and is sustained by trusting humans as capable of grace. That is so insightful. Without grace community will not form and
without grace, community certainly cannot grow and be sustained over time.
And when humans lose the capability of being graceful, the
community is doomed. It may take a while
to die, but community is doomed. So we can work on community by encouraging and
cultivating the graciousness of human beings.
The other key element Merton identifies is trusting that
humans are capable of cooperation. So
true! People who refuse to cooperate are
communal cancers. Any coach knows that
fact. Can folks be taught to
cooperate? I think so. Can they be forced? Probably for a while, but with resentment. And resentment infects any possibility for
authentic community.
I still love the idea of community. But I now know the role grace and cooperation
play in the formation of community.
Comments
Post a Comment