Skip to main content

I Had to Laugh

I had to laugh.  After reading a blog a friend of mine sent to me, I had to laugh.  I am not a blogger.  But I have this friend who is an active blogger.  I understand that is an important part of what is called “social media.”  And I know she and others think I ought to be more involved in things like this.  But I can only handle so much technology!

Basically the blog she sent me is a little article.  So had it appeared in print somewhere, I would have been happy to grab it and read it.  The title of the blog is “Laugh Harder, Do Better.”  The author, Ross Smith, offers a compelling case for laughing through your day.  Smith wonders whether “that laughter is a serious success metric for a healthy, creative, and innovative organization?”  He implies it could be.  I find this interesting since I have done some writing on innovation.  Could it be that healthy, innovative organizations are those who find a way to add---or at least, allow---laughter in the workplace?  I think the answer is “yes.”

Ross Smith also suggests a link between laughter and happy people.  Of course, I am not so naïve as to believe laughing drives all one’s problem away.  There are studies that suggest that laughter does give people more energy and probably makes them less prone to sickness.  But clearly, a laugh a day will not prevent cancer.  And certainly, no matter how much I laugh each day, some day I will die.  Laughter does not prevent death!

However, if laughter can increase my chances of being healthy and happy, I give it some attention.  Smith quotes Dr. Michael Titze, a German psychologist who is a humor therapist (now that makes me laugh!)  I did not know there were humor therapists!  Apparently according to Dr. Titze “in the 1950s people used to laugh 18 minutes a day, but today we laugh not more than 6 minutes a day, despite the huge rise in the standard of living.”  Two things hit me when I read this.  I don’t know how Titze finds the means to come up with these figures.  And secondly, I have no clue how many minutes a day I laugh.  But I fear I am much closer to 6 minutes than 18 minutes.

All this connects because I know there is a high correlation between how engaged I feel at work and whether I have a friend there.  And if I am able to add laughter to the equation, then a good workplace is a place where I have some friends and some real chance there will be laughter. 

So far, so good, you might be thinking.  But what does this have to do with the spiritual?  Everything, I would respond, because it has to do with being fully human which, for me, means being fully alive.  And for me, this could be a basic definition of being spiritual, namely, that I am fully human and fully alive.  Of course, that is pretty general.  We can add specifics to what it means being fully human.

All I know is that I spend too many days not being fully human.  I am not fully human when I don’t get proper rest and when I don’t eat well.  I am not fully human when I am grumpy and am whinny about the things and, especially, the people in my life.  I am not fully human when God is not giving me all I want.  After all, what good is a God who does not give us what we want!

So maybe laughter is not the best medicine, but it is a very good medicine.  And I think laughter can be quite spiritual.  Laughter engages and connects me to someone or to a situation.  Of course, this can get tricky.  Clearly, there are those forms of and occasions for bad or sick humor.  Who has not laughed inappropriately at things we should not have found funny?

My own experience suggests that laughter is an important part of a spiritual community.  And my experience also suggests that too often spirituality is assumed to be always serious.  And serious spirituality should have no place for humor or laughs.  HA to that, I say!

I will admit there is a strong strand in Christian history that distrusts or, even, is against humor and laughter.  This stand of history is suspicious of any spiritual person laughing and having fun.  Again, HA to this, I say.  So what do I say, then?

I say, I had to laugh.  I believe what Ross Smith tells me.  I am even going to aim for the 18 minutes a day that Dr. Titze tells me folks managed in the 1950s.  I know laughter happens more predictably and easier for me when I am with people.  So I want to make sure I am around people enough to give me a laugh.

I am going to look for mentors.  We all know there are some people who just seem to find laughter easy to do.  They are usually laughing and make others laugh, too. They usually look like they are having fun.  And that makes them seem happier.  And if I can help my own community move more fully into that direction, that would be something.  This is a good day to begin.  That’s no joke! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.             Brooks’ article focused on the 2016 contentious election.   He provocatively suggests, “Read Buber, Not the Polls!”   I think Brooks puts

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was full of sports for me.   Commitment would have been presupposed t

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.   And other groups practice this spiri