There are so many different ways to think about the
spiritual life. And of course, in our
country there are so many different variations of religious experiences. There are liberals and conservatives. There are fundamentalists and
Pentecostals. Besides the dizzying
variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian
traditions. There are the major
traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on. There are the slightly more obscure
traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.
And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.
There are defining doctrines and religious practices. Some of these are specific to a particular
tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan,
which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.
Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious
board. Something like meditation would
be a good example. Christians meditate;
Buddhists meditate. And other groups
practice this spiritual discipline.
A favorite way I like to think about my own Quaker tradition
that has some currency among other traditions is with the distinction between
the inward journey and the outward pilgrimage.
This is certainly not unique to Quakers.
Quite a number of the different Christian traditions have their own
version of this way of being spiritual.
It is also not uncommon in other religious traditions.
Since I believe it is a good way to understand the spiritual
life, let’s take some time to detail what this dual focus means. One direction of the focus is inward. Personally this is the arena of experience,
as my Quaker tradition talks about it.
The inward journey is the effort I put out in order to “meet” God
somewhere in the internal spaces of my life.
Personally for me, this usually is felt in my midsection---in my
belly. Maybe it is because I live so
much of my normal life in my head, I need spiritually to begin to drop from my
head to my heart in order to experience the Holy One.
There deeper within my heart is the core place where I
encounter the Other, whom I call God.
Thomas Kelly, perhaps my favorite Quaker writer opens his wonderful
book, A Testament of Devotion, with
words to this effect. “Deep within us
all there is an amazing inner sanctuary of the soul.” My inward journey is the quest to discover
this amazing inner sanctuary of the soul.
And if I have discovered it, then I want to connect with the One who
gave me life and breathes the Spirit into my life.
Even if I am graced with this inward experience, I cannot
hold it or capture it. Even if it feels
like a communion with the Living One, at some point the experience begins to
recede and my normal life resumes. Life
cannot be lived inside at the altar.
However life can be lived “from” that altar. And this anticipates the outward pilgrimage.
I like the language of pilgrimage for this outward
focus. Pilgrimage is more religiously
specific than a journey or a trip. I can
take a trip to New York or to Tokyo, but it is not a pilgrimage. A pilgrimage typically has a religious intent
and, ultimately, religious content. A
pilgrimage is purposeful. The
destination normally is a religious destination. But this does not mean the course of the
pilgrimage is uneventful.
Indeed, for my Quaker tradition the outward pilgrimage is
usually portrayed with an emphasis on religious action and service. If the inward journey is about experience,
then the outward pilgrimage is about express---expression of that inward
spiritual experience. The outward
pilgrimage is the “outward living from the spiritual center.” The pilgrimage is not just about destination;
it is about day-to-day.
Although we have talked first about the inward journey and,
then, the outward pilgrimage, they are not sequential. Rather, they are simultaneous. Experience is simultaneously expressed in the
pilgrimage. And the spiritual expression
fuels more encounters at the amazing inner sanctuary of the soul. Both exist in tension and intentionally. They are the two halves of the spiritual
whole person.
Periodically it is well to ask about our spiritual growth
and development. We can ask questions
from either the journey or pilgrimage perspective. But we do well to remember that one leads to
questions about the other. There may be
seasons in which one---the journey or the pilgrimage---seems to be more
important or in ascendency. But over
time the need to be in a healthy balance.
For many of us living “normal” lives in our little world,
the outward part might be more often the focus.
We are trying to live a good life.
We are caring, fair, reasonable people.
We want to live a life helping others, avoiding as much sin as
possible. But we can be unaware or
forgetful how important the inward journey is.
If we travel that inward journey road, our outward expression will
become easier, deeper and more consistent.
Others of us think spirituality is just about the inner
experience. We are really adept at
prayer, meditation, etc. We may have a
rich inner life. But we may see no
carry-over---no engagement in serving or saving our world in any way. We are too content to see spirituality as an
inner dynamic between ourselves and God.
This is insufficient.
The true spiritual life is a dual trip: inward journey and
outward pilgrimage.
I really appreciate this article and the language of "inner journey and outer pilgrimage". Thanks for sharing!
ReplyDeleteIt's a solid for me too.
DeleteSo there should be a balance of the Holiness of our experience with God and flesh and blood, whether our own or with our fellowman. Not the forgeting of this "old man's" 'dream' but being a doer of it in the new man awake as a new creature.
ReplyDelete