Skip to main content

In the Stillness of the Spirit

It was an innocent conversation, but out of it came a gem for me.  The woman who was talking mentioned the word, stillness, as an afterthought.  But it became central for me and, therefore, the focus of some serious reflection.  That is it.  Sometimes the key is stillness…stillness of the spirit. 

In some ways I am surprised I never thought about this before.  It is like all those things we come to know; after we know it, we can’t believe we did not figure it out much earlier!  I thought the same thing after I saw my first hula-hoop!  Why could I not have invented that…I could be rich!

When I think about stillness, I am thinking about how I approach God or the Spirit.  I know there are many ways to do this---both within Christianity and in the various other non-Christian traditions.  But for me stillness is what works most predictably and, therefore, the best. 

But first, let me contrast it with silence and solitude, the two classic spiritual disciplines.  Of course, I have nothing against either two disciplines.  They both play a key role in my spiritual path.  In fact, stillness works very well with either or both of them.

Silence is a medium wherein one ceases speaking.  Or at a deeper level, one tries to quiet one’s environment.  Silence could be defined simply as the lack of noise.  The way I am using it, it is an external matter.  If I am in a noisy place, it is more difficult for me to center and be found in the Spirit.  Typically, noise is distracting.  Or worse, I am intrigued by whatever noise---could even be some “noise” I find attractive and, therefore, am pulled toward it.  But that lack of silence seldom centers me in the Spirit.

The same goes with solitude.  I am introverted enough to need some solitude almost every day.  I enjoy being with other people and, indeed, spend quite a bit of every day with folks.  But I like solitude.  But by itself, solitude again is an external thing.  If I choose solitude, all that really means is I am by myself---I am alone.  That does not necessarily lead to anything spiritual, certainly not to being centered in the Spirit.

And this is where stillness comes into play for me.  Stillness may start with my solitude.  It may originate in silence.  But stillness goes inward and potentially it goes deep.  I can be in silence and solitude and not be still.  In fact, it is not unusual for me to begin a devotional time by myself and in silence.  And yet, ideas are racing around in my head.  My thoughts jump from one to another like monkeys in a tree.  I am not “still” at all. 

It is only as I begin to still myself, that I am aware I have begun the process of centering.  I don’t go chasing those monkeys in my mind!  I think stillness is a process.  One begins to center…to go deeper.  One goes deeper until I begin to get the sense that I am coming to be centered---which means I have begun to approach the Divine Center which was there all along.

I understand the process of stilling as both an active and passive process.  It is active in the sense that I must engage it.  I must pursue it.  I have to try---to make effort.  But like so much in spirituality, there also is the passive element.  In fact, passive is not a good word here.  It really is grace---really is gift.

So stillness requires my effort and it will also be graced.  With effort and grace my spirit can be stilled in a process of centering that brings me to the Divine Center.  There I will be nourished and nurtured.  There I can drink from the wells of living waters.  I can feast on the Bread of Life.

It is all there in the stillness of the Spirit.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.             Brooks’ article focused on the 2016 contentious election.   He provocatively suggests, “Read Buber, Not the Polls!”   I think Brooks puts

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was full of sports for me.   Commitment would have been presupposed t

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.   And other groups practice this spiri