Skip to main content

Resilience

A word that is being used a great deal in the circles I find myself is resilience.  In fact, it is a concept my co-authors and I have included in our new book, Exception to the Rule.  The reality behind the concept, resilience, is not new, but the need for the idea is more prevalent than for a long time.  We might explore why today there is such a need for the language of resiliency, but that will come in another reflection.  First I want to explore the nature of resiliency and why it is such an important spiritual concept for humans.
   
As I said, you bump into the idea of resiliency in many places today.  However, one of the recent places I read about it was Krista Tippett’s wonderful 2016 book, Becoming Wise.  I like her subtitle, “An Inquiry into the Mystery and Art of Living.”  Toward the end of her book she notes, “I’m glad for the language of resilience that has entered the twenty-first-century lexicon, from urban planning to mental health.”  Indeed, the word is becoming ubiquitous.  Tippett continues, “Resilience is a successor to mere progress, a companion to sustainability.  It acknowledges from the outset that things will go wrong.”
   
I am confident that last line is key.  It is a line that is realistic: things will go wrong.  Perhaps that is the problem with the idea of progress.  Of course, we all know there will be progress---there will be growth.  In fact, I spend most of my time in a growth industry---namely, education.  But it is not a straight line charting inevitable growth.  There are ups and downs.  Things don’t go perfectly.  Folks make mistakes.  I make mistakes.  Given enough time, we all know that things will go wrong.  Resiliency deals with life at that point: when things have gone wrong.
   
Sometimes it is a failure.  Sometimes a mistake.  Sometimes it is a sin.  Something has gone wrong.  I like how Tippett puts it.  “All of our solutions will eventually outlive their usefulness.  We will all make messes, and disruption we do not cause or predict will land on us.  This is the drama of being alive.”  So now what?  Resiliency affirms that we can bounce back.  Failure, mistakes and sins need not be the last word.  We can all bounce back. We are resilient.
   
Let’s follow Tippett’s thinking process about resiliency.  She says, “To nurture a resilient human being, or a resilient city, is to build in an expectation of adversity, a capacity for inevitably vulnerability.”  That is the key foundational setting for resiliency.  We are vulnerable.  We need to assume our vulnerability will one day result in hurt.  Resiliency is what we do when that day comes.  The resilient ones will bounce back.  They will find a way to nurture the wound of failure, setback, mess or sin and not let that be the last word.  We will come back stronger than ever.  Resilient humans will be hurt, but they won’t be ultimately defeated. 
   
Resiliency builds hope into our lives.  I like again the way Tippett describes resiliency.  “It’s a shift from wish-based optimism to reality-based hope.”  Perhaps this is the right place to introduce the spirituality of resilience.  Certainly hope is part of the human fabric, although it is true that some folks lose their ability to hope.  For some folks, life gets so bad---so bleak---they fall into despair.  They literally live without hope.  But if we are spiritual---and if God is somehow in our picture---we cannot despair.  Even if we can’t hope, God hopes for us. 
   
And this is where I see one key role for resiliency.  It is a basis for hope.  It is a capacity for knowing there is always more---more than just failure, sin, messes and mistakes.  And if we acknowledge the spiritual dimension, we know we are not in it alone.  I take real solace in that fact.  And I am joined by Tippett.  Once more, we can read her words.  She says, “Resilience is at once proactive, pragmatic, and humble.  It knows it needs others.”  And it knows we will have the help of others.
   
And finally, Tippett points to the way resiliency works.  She claims, “It doesn’t overcome failure so much as transmute it, integrating it into the reality that evolves.”  This is a profound insight.  When we fail or make messes, we sometimes feel like that is the end of the world.  Sometimes our sins are so heinous, we think we are forever condemned.  There is not use to go on.  This can lead to despair, which in turn, can lead to suicide---literally or metaphorically.  Resilience says there is hope---there is life beyond the problem. 
   
Resilience says that reality evolves.  There is the hope.  Reality is not simply a given---objective and unchanging.  God is always creator and creative.  Adam and Eve blew it and so will we.  But that is not the last word.  The gospel is always a gospel of grace and of hope.  It is about life, not death.  Resilience is the contemporary word to describe the human capacity to respond to grace and hope and to live.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.             Brooks’ article focused on the 2016 contentious election.   He provocatively suggests, “Read Buber, Not the Polls!”   I think Brooks puts

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was full of sports for me.   Commitment would have been presupposed t

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.   And other groups practice this spiri