Skip to main content

Pathways of the Heart

Recently I learned that one of the leading commentators on contemporary spirituality is very ill.  Phyllis Tickle is someone I do not know well, but she is one whose writings I have followed.   She was educated in traditional religious ways.  Instead, she was a writer and editor.  She had some short teaching stints in a couple colleges, but she came to her fame as an editor, most noteworthy as editor in the newly constituted religion division at Publisher’s Weekly.

Tickle spent most of her life in Tennessee.  In 1977 she moved with her physician husband, Sam, to a small farm---a very different setting than the urban Memphis she left.  Perhaps the most important facet of her training is the fact the she is a mother of seven, one of whom died nearly as soon as he was born.  Factors like this shape our perceptions and understanding about life.  We are all products of our experiences.

In a touching news article, reporter David Gibson, narrates this latest saga of Tickle’s health issues and offers her profound response to what is a death sentence.  However, rather than recounting this, I found another piece of the article more compelling.  In an attempt to describe Tickle’s influence on the American scene, Gibson uses a phrase that grabbed me.  He tells us, “Tickle has diligently mapped the pathways of the heart and the demographics of the soul while becoming one of the nation’s leading public intellectuals on all things religious.”

I loved that phrase, “pathways of the heart.”  Perhaps I like it so much because a course I teach is entitled, Modern Spiritual Paths.  The first thing that is true about my course title and the phrase used about Tickle is the fact that “paths” is plural.  Paths or pathways?  I see these synonymously.  And I do believe there are multiple pathways to connecting with the Holy One, as I choose to describe God.  Indeed, I think there are even “religious” pathways that may not even have a traditional idea of God.  Buddhism is likely the best example here.  For example, I don’t think we could approach the Dalai Lama and say, “Because you don’t have a traditional view of God, you cannot be religious!”

The second thing I like about this description of Tickly is the focus on the “heart.” The author says that she has mapped the pathways of the heart.  Of course, heart is being used metaphorically.  In the Old Testament context “heart” means the whole person.  Heart is not the soul-part, separate from the flesh-part of human beings.  In religious terms heart is who I am and what I do.  The heart has desires; the heart loves and can be broken.  It is a powerful metaphor.

Tickle knows and so do I that finding a pathway of the heart is a key to a deep and meaningful life.  In her case and in mine the pathway of the heart stems from God and leads back to the Holy One.  One function of religion is to offer pathways to our heart.  Even within Christianity, there is not a single pathway.  I have spent a fair amount of time finding one that speaks to my condition, as Quakers would say.

Perhaps one of the biggest tasks for the heart pathway is to find a way that enables us not only to live meaningfully, but also to die with dignity and meaning.  This is the chapter that Tickle has now entered.  And not surprisingly, she is doing it with some real grace.  As she says, “the dying is my next career.”

I appreciate her realistic perspective.  She says, “At 81 you figure you’re going to die of something, and sooner rather than later…I could almost embrace this, that, OK, now I know what it’s probably going to be, and probably how much time there is. So you can clean up some of the mess you’ve made and tie up some of the loose ends.”  It is another line, however, that struck me as powerfully spiritual.  She quips, “Am I grateful for this?  Not exactly.  But I’m not unhappy about it.  And that’s very difficult for people to understand.”

I can apply this to my own life.  Even though I am not under an immediate death sentence, I know death is inevitable.  Am I grateful for that?  No.  But with Tickle, I am not unhappy about it.  I know I can still do something about life---and I am grateful for my life and for my pathway of the heart.  It will take me to good places.  That does make me happy.

Tickle concludes the interview by acknowledging she has always had an inner voice who tells he what to do.  I can hear this and understand it, but it is different from my experience.  I love her clarity and her willingness to go with the truth that God gives to her.  “It’s the truth.  Just like I’m told to do this…Which is why it doesn’t bother me. The dying is my next career.”

I am old enough to know her pathway is somewhat different than mine.  So I need to know how my own “inner voice” speaks its truth to me.  I am confident the inner voice speaks to my “heart.”  And my pathway is my way of knowing, hearing and accepting my truth.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.             Brooks’ article focused on the 2016 contentious election.   He provocatively suggests, “Read Buber, Not the Polls!”   I think Brooks puts

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was full of sports for me.   Commitment would have been presupposed t

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.   And other groups practice this spiri