Skip to main content

God’s Face

Most of the time I feel quite fortunate.  The nature of my job requires that I read books and other things.  Because I have the privilege of teaching, I have to assign various books.  And then I have to read them and think about the material before I see students who interact with the material.  Sometimes I know those same students groan about having to read the things.  And I want to say, “Really?”  “Would you like to have a boring job instead?”           

As I was reading last night in preparation for a class, I ran across these words from the Qur’an (Koran) which was quoted by one of my textbooks.  I don’t know the Qur’an very well, so I was glad to get unexpectedly something from it.  The quotation was simple.  It said, “Wherever you turn, there is the face of God.” (Walsh, 173)  Having read it, I now get the opportunity to think about it.  In many ways this is a spiritual discipline.           

First of all, let me say I must have immediately thought I understood the passage, because immediately I thought that it was true.  What this means is my understanding of the passage resonates with my own theological understanding of God and how I think God is present in the world.  Let’s unpack that a little more.          

Clearly this important part of the Qur’an quotation is the idea of the face of God.  Those are simple words, but the concepts are not so simple.  Obviously the language is metaphorical.  This merely means that there is a God in my view; God exists.  But I don’t for a minute think God has a literal face.  God does not have a body with a face, two arms and some legs like you and I do.             

I still prefer the idea of “Spirit” as the best description of God.  Because God is Spirit, God is like the wind or like breath.  I can know and understand the concepts of wind and breath and affirm that somehow God is just as real---just as present.  So why bother with the metaphor of “face?”  Why bother to talk about “God’s face?”          

We bother---and the Qur’an bothers---because it is important to be able to describe things about God.  If I want to be able to describe for you how it is I experience God, then I will need some words.  And if you also have experiences of the Divinity, I hope you will want to share with me.  And you also will need some words.  Because humans are capable of some complex thinking, we have learned to talk with each other in metaphors, analogies, figures of speeches, etc.  Actually our English language is full of these kinds of descriptions.           

So when the Qur’an says that wherever we turn, there is the face of God, it means that God is everywhere.  No matter where we turn our gaze, God can be seen.  Clearly this suggests that much of the time when I am looking around, I am not really seeing.  So often in my looking around, I would claim that I do not see God.  So is God not there or do I not see God?  The Qur’an suggests the problem is with me and not God.  I would agree!           

The real issue in this quotation is the phrase, “the face of God.”  As we noted already, this is a metaphor.  But why choose the metaphor of “face?”  The key is in the role that we give to a person’s face.  Let me suggest that we often think that if we see someone’s face, we thereby “see the person.”  We can go into a little detail.          

It seems to me that the first thing we generally see when we meet someone is his or her face.  There are less distinguishing features in our hands or our knees!  So the face---my face and your face---is the most distinguishing feature.  You can tell it is I when you see my face.  That is why twins are so difficult!          

We also talk about seeing the “face of something.”  The face of a building is called the façade.  We know that a façade can mislead us.  Things behind the façade might not be like the façade would suggest.  In fact, sometimes we hear about someone who is putting on a façade.  This means we cannot take who they are or what they say at “face value!”           

Now back to God, we see what is at stake when we see the face of God wherever we turn.  I connect the idea of façade here.  Let’s imagine that nature is the façade of God---the face of the Divinity.  When I walk through the beauty of the autumn trees, I see seeing the face of God.  When I become enamored by the first winter snowfall, I contemplate God’s face.           

One of the surest façades of God is the newborn baby’s smile.  It is simply divine!  There is power in that infant smile.  It is the power of God.  It is as if the Divinity Itself has once again become incarnate---become flesh---and we behold the Divine Glory.  I believe in one real sense this is true.           

Having said all this, I realize I need some more work in “face recognition.”  I need to be more aware and more alert to see the face of God wherever I turn. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.             Brooks’ article focused on the 2016 contentious election.   He provocatively suggests, “Read Buber, Not the Polls!”   I think Brooks puts

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was full of sports for me.   Commitment would have been presupposed t

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.   And other groups practice this spiri