Skip to main content

The Image of God

One of the things I enjoy doing is reviewing books.  There is a well-known service known as CHOICE.  This organization offers reviews of new books and, now, other media.  For quite some time, I have been a reviewer for the organization.  They send me three or four books annually and I read and write a review.  Libraries and other places routinely plan their buying of new resources by seeing what the CHOICE reviews say about particular books.  I am not paid to do this, but I do get to keep the book I review.

Probably I would not buy most of these books.  Some of them I don’t even like very much.  Those are not fun reviews to write.  Other books are good and some are even amazing.  I have read things I otherwise would not have read.  And it is a good way for me to stay current in my own area of studies. 

A book arrived recently and I have been reading it to prepare to write the review.  When I saw the author’s name, I immediately recognized it.  I have read and reviewed an earlier book by him.  In fact, the guy is writing a five-volume series, so I am on number two in this series.  I really liked the first volume and am enjoying the second one as I read it.  The author, Veli-Matti Kärkkäinen, has finished volume 3 which I now have.  It is entitled, Creation and History.  It focuses on the Christian perspective on creation and nature, plus a Christian look at human nature.  I am intrigued by both issues.

Since it is a huge book, I choose to share a passage here and there which jumps out at me.  In the section on human nature, I read the following sentence.  “Human personhood does not admit degrees.” (427)  He follows this with reference to humans being created in the image of God.  He says, “Defining the image of God in terms of being related to God saves theology from anchoring human dignity in the possession of a quality or commodity, such as intelligence or health.  One’s relation to the Creator is not affected in the least by one’s disabilities, not even intellectual ones.”  That strikes me as pretty profound.  Let’s unpack it a little bit.

It is insightful to vest the idea of the image of God in God and not in human beings.  Simply put, this means that God is in charge of making us all in God’s image.  There is no limitation---that is, if you are human.  It takes humans off the hook, so to speak, of trying to figure out who is in the image of God and who may have become too far out of it to qualify anymore.  I find that a relief.

I do not find it surprising that Käkkäinen talks about the “dignity” of humans.  This relates the image of God to the dignity of humanity.  In this sense dignity is not some social norm or expectation; it is a divine declaration.  It is as if God declares, “I created you and, therefore, you possess dignity.”  Dignity is not a matter of wealth, education, luck, upbringing, etc. 

The author says as much.  He says that human dignity if not related to possession of any quality or commodity.  It is always tempting to think the smart ones are the ones who have it made.  They are “better than” the rest of us.  Perhaps in worldly terms, this is true.  Smart ones do have advantages in many ways.  But they have no advantage when it comes to God and relating to God.  To me that is not funny; it is a relief.  It says, “If you’re not smart, don’t worry!”

That goes for health, too.  In effect, it acknowledges that sick people, disabled people and all other limited human beings are also created in the image of God and, therefore, carry an inherent dignity in themselves.  Once again, this is so unlike the world and how the world tends to treat people.  Too easily we marginalize or dismiss the old people, the infirm, the weak, etc.  Essentially, the world tells these folks they are not productive and, hence, they are not worth anything!  Effectively, the world is saying to these people, “God damn you!”

But that’s not God’s intent or style.  As the old kid’s saying goes, “God don’t create junk!”  God deals in dignity, not dumps.  That does not mean we cannot on our own become derelicts.  Even though we are in the image of God and carry that divine dignity within us, we can still choose to be and act in undignified ways.  We don’t lose our dignity, but we abuse it.  It is there all along and can be restored.  But we can surely show our worst side.

The bottom line remains.  We are images of God and we are inherently creatures of dignity.  As I get older, this is good news.  If I am not beautiful, this is very good news.  I don’t have to apply for or qualify for my dignity.  Of course, others can deny it in me.  Others can try to take it away.  Or worse, make me feel like I don’t have dignity or don’t deserve it. 

That is why these couple of sentences from this new book are so important.  And this is the message that all folks who think they know anything about God or sense of relationship with that God need to take forward into our world.  To have this perspective on creation and humanity would take away any cause for racism, sexism, classism, etc.  It says to all humans: we share the same treasure in earthen vessels.  We are the living dignity of the Divinity Itself.

Popular posts from this blog

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.There are liberals and conservatives.There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions. There are defining doctrines and religious practices.Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan, which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.Something like meditation would be a good example.Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.And other groups practice this spiritual discipline. A favorite way I like to …

A Pain is not a Pain

A rose may be a rose, but a pain is not a pain.  Maybe somebody has said that before, but I have never heard it.  So I am assuming (for the moment) I made it up.  Of course, most of us have heard that line, “a rose is a rose.”  I don’t know who said it first or if I should give it a footnote, but I do know that I did not create that line.  Furthermore, we all could explain what the phrase, a rose is a rose, means.

However, if I say, “a pain is not a pain,” the reader may not be too sure what I mean by that.  And if the reader is unsure, he or she does not know whether to agree with me or say balderdash!  So let me explain it by some development.

For sure, every adult knows what pain means.  It is difficult to imagine living into adulthood and not experiencing some kind of pain.  There is physical pain; we all know this.  There is emotional pain----a pain many people know all too well…and others may barely know.  There may be something like spiritual pain, but this one is tricky.  Not …

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”
The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.A committed person was someone to be admired.He was loyal and steady.Now a commitment is something you avoid.You don’t want to tie yourself down.”I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.
For example, growing up was full of sports for me.Commitment would have been presupposed to be part of a team. If you were going to pl…