As a graduate of a couple schools, I get my share of alumni
magazines. Additionally, I get the
magazines from some of my two girls’ various universities. Rather than toss these, I am actually
intrigued by what the different universities are offering for my reading. Clearly in the case of my two girls, I was
not the intended audience. But I am
interested in what some of the nation’s best schools want their alums to read.
In my own case I clearly am the targeted audience. Certainly the Divinity School I attended is
assuming people like me are reading this material. I am old enough now and far enough away from
the intellectual epicenters, I am not on the cutting edge of religious scholarship. I am ok with that. I appreciate scholarship, but also find times
when the scholarship is too far out there---too arcane---for the kind of
ministry I am doing. I also am reminded
I always felt called to be involved in ministry broadly defined. My joy is to serve.
But I am still intellectually intrigued by a wide-range of
thought. So when a magazine comes, I
quickly thumb through the whole issue. I
guess I am either bored or curious! Then
over the next few days, I will begin to read the various articles. I do not read in order to take an examination
and prove how smart I am. Fortunately,
those days are long past! I read out of
an inherent interest in learning something---learning how to think differently
or more deeply.
Such was my perspective when I saw the title of an article: “The
Work of Art and the Art of Life.” The
author was Michael Jackson, a name I did not recognize. That’s ok with me; I do not need to know the
author for him or her to be valuable to me.
I know I have been valuable to some people and they did not know my
name! So I plunged into the article.
The article really was about art, but it also had a
sub-theme that recognized what can be said about art can also be claimed, for
the most part, about religion. Let me
quote one sentence, for example, and make you aware of what the author,
Jackson, says in effect, “The same can be said about religion.”
Jackson confesses that he is “focusing not on art as an
expression of individual genius or an as aesthetic, but on the work of art, where ‘work’ is to be read
as a verb rather than a noun and understood as a technê for making life more meaningful, enjoyable, and
manageable…Crucial to this point of view is the pragmatist assumption that art
(ars) and technê are intimately linked, and that the work of art is a matter
of making, acting, and doing before it is a form of knowledge, an object of
contemplation, or a thing of beauty.” I
was captivated by these two sentences and want to unpack them and think about
them more fully.
The first thing that caught my attention was the focus on
the “work of art.” If the same thing can
be said, then we appropriately can talk about the “work of religion.” I find this idea appealing. I do think religion is often and regularly a
work—it takes effort and discipline.
That makes sense to me.
I also like the focus on the word, “work,” as a verb rather
than a noun. The verb is the
action-word. Verbs are creative, dynamic
and energetic. Nouns are states of
being. If we apply this to religion,
then religion is creative, dynamic and energetic. Religion does have beliefs, doctrines and
rituals. But these are more like
nouns. They exist and we simply link to
them. But the life of faith is more
verb-like: it takes work---today and again tomorrow.
Although some folks might not like to think about religion
as a technê---a technique---I find
that appealing. The technique is our way
of making religion---the making, acting and doing that Jackson mentions. These are active verbs---religion is the
result of active work---of work as an activity.
This makes perfect sense to me, especially if we see religion as an
active way of living. If we simply see
religion as accepting a few doctrines, then it makes less sense.
Finally, I liked what Jackson said about art and about which
we can also say about religion. He talks
about art and religion as a technique---as a means---of making life more
meaningful, enjoyable and manageable.
These sound like good things for me!
I want a more meaningful life. I
would love to enjoy life as much as possible.
And who does not want a life that is manageable? I concur that religion helps me on all three
counts.
I do feel life is meaningful, enjoyable and manageable. It is why I am a person of faith---why being
spiritual is more like a verb than a noun. It is something I do…today and again
tomorrow.
Comments
Post a Comment