Skip to main content

Go Global

When I was growing up in rural Indiana, I was provincial.  I did not know I was provincial; in fact, I am not sure I would even have known what that word meant.  If you look up the word in a dictionary, you will find a couple of apt definitions.  A provincial person is someone of “local or restricted interests or outlooks.”  That described me!  Another definition of provincial is a “person lacking urban polish or refinement.”  Yep, that described me.

There was very little diversity in my life experience…ethnically, racially, religiously…you name it.  No one I knew drove a non-American made car.  Career choices for boys and girls were pretty clear with little overlap.  When you are provincial, it does not occur to you to ask why.  For a provincial outlook, most of life is a given.  One could have hopes and aspirations, but most people I knew did not have hopes that were very big or expansive.

In my experience there were only two kinds of people who could “go global:” soldiers and missionaries.  I had no aspiration for either option.  One scared me and the other held no interest for me.

I think my experience and, consequently, view of God was also provincial.  Of course, I did not think God was a glorified Indiana farmer, but my God certainly was not big enough for the universe that I did not know very well.  And the image of God as Shepherd did not serve very effectively to break my provincial theological outlook.  I do not think I was open to nor expectant of everything the Spirit could do in one’s life.

In some ways that sounds too dramatic.  It sounds as if some spiritual hurricane blew through my life and transformed me in remarkable ways.  Not true…not in any dramatic fashion anyway.  But I do think transformational things have happened for me.  And I believe just as seriously the Spirit transforms others…perhaps even more dramatically.  However, most transformations are slow, subtle, and often, sublime.

As I ponder it, I realize how frequently the transformative work of the Spirit has come every time I had the chance to “go global.”  I never thought about it, but when we read the words of Jesus, we have “gone global.”  Jesus was not an Indiana farmer.  He was a Palestinian Jew who lived in a different era and within a different context.

The problem with being provincial is one interprets the global in provincial terms.  I needed to learn to “read Jesus” in his global context.  Especially, I needed to learn how to read the Buddha or Mohammed in their contexts. 

A key in becoming less provincial is to become aware.  That is easy to say, but when you are provincial, it is not easy to do.  Usually for the provincial person, everything in his or her world reinforces that restricted outlook. And if I am not aware, it is really difficult to understand other points of view, much less, appreciate them.

Growing out of one’s provincialism is something like losing one’s naïveté.  Not only have I changed---and I am convinced that is good---but God also has changed.  Oh, I doubt that God has changed, but I sure have changed the way I perceive who God is and how God works. 

I am sure God has always been “global.”  God has always been involved with the Chinese, Indians, Africans, etc.  I had to “go global” in order to understand that.  And when you “go global,” then you also understand you are given a divine mission to become a peace-maker, a lover, and a co-laborer to the kingdom will come…on earth as it is in heaven.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-Thou Relationships

Those of us who have read theology or, perhaps, those who are people of faith and are old enough might well recognize this title as a reminder of the late Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber.   I remember reading Buber’s book, I and Thou , when I was in college in the 1960s.   It was already a famous book by then.   I am not sure I fully understood it, but that would not be the last time I read it.   It has been a while since I looked at the book.             Buber came up in a conversation with a friend who asked if I had seen the recent article by David Brooks?   I had not seen it, but when I was told about it, I knew I would quickly locate and read that piece.   I very much like what Brooks decides to write about and what he contributes to societal conversation.   I wish more people read him and took him seriously.             Brooks’ article focused on the 2016 contentious election.   He provocatively suggests, “Read Buber, Not the Polls!”   I think Brooks puts

Spiritual Commitment

I was reading along in a very nice little book and hit these lines about commitment.   The author, Mitch Albom, uses the voice of one of the main characters of his nonfiction book about faith to reflect on commitment.   The voice belongs to Albom’s old rabbi of the Jewish synagogue where he went until his college days.   The old rabbi, Albert Lewis, says “the word ‘commitment’ has lost its meaning.”    The rabbi continues in a way that surely would have many people saying, “Amen!”   About commitment he says, “I’m old enough when it used to be a positive.   A committed person was someone to be admired.   He was loyal and steady.   Now a commitment is something you avoid.   You don’t want to tie yourself down.”   I also think I am old enough to know that commitment was usually a positive word.   I can think of a range of situations in which commitment would have been seen to be positive.   For example, growing up was full of sports for me.   Commitment would have been presupposed t

Inward Journey and Outward Pilgrimage

There are so many different ways to think about the spiritual life.   And of course, in our country there are so many different variations of religious experiences.   There are liberals and conservatives.   There are fundamentalists and Pentecostals.   Besides the dizzying variety of Christian traditions, there are many different non-Christian traditions.   There are the major traditions, such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and so on.   There are the slightly more obscure traditions, such as Sikhism, Jainism, etc.   And then there are more fringe groups and, even, pseudo-religions.   There are defining doctrines and religious practices.   Some of these are specific to a particular tradition or a few traditions, such as the koan , which is used in Zen Buddhism for example.   Other defining doctrines or practices are common across the religious board.   Something like meditation would be a good example.   Christians meditate; Buddhists meditate.   And other groups practice this spiri